Toyota Fortuner 2.7L EXR vs Tang L EV 670 Standard Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

180 km/h

/

4

/

2694 cc

/

GCC

/

Dimensions

7 Seater

7

5 Doors

/

4795 mm

5040

1855 mm

1996

1835 mm

1760

2750 mm

2950

348 L

/

220 mm

/

Fuel Economy

10.4 (KM/L)

/

80 L

/

8 Km/L

/

Comfort

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

Keyless Entry

/

✓

/

Interior

Fabric

/

Digital

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

Manual

/

✓

/

✓

/

Standard

/

✓

/

Safety

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

Infotainment

Android LCD

/

✓

/

Transmission

6 Speed Automatic

DHT

Chassis & Steering

All Wheel Drive

/

McPherson Strut Coil Springs

/

Torsion Beam with Coil Springs

/

Electric Power Steering (EPS)

/

Key Spec

2.4 L - 4.0 L

/

147 BHP - 235 BHP

680 BHP

6 Speed Automatic & 6-Speed Automatic Transmission & Automatic

DHT

Petrol & Diesel & Gasoline & Petrol

Electric

TBD

/

7 Seater - 7 Seater

7

/

TBD

/

TBD

Exterior

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

LED

/

✓

/

Engine

V

/

2.7 L

/

Petrol

Electric

4

/

164 BHP

680 BHP

245 Nm

/

Technologies

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Toyota Fortuner 2.7L EXR

    • Rear Defogger
    • Rear Power Outlet
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Keyless Start
    • Heater
    • Rear Camera
    • Headlight On Reminder
    • Remote key types
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Lock
    • Active braking
  • Tang L EV 670 Standard

    Review Comparison

    Positive

    • Strong off-road performance
    • Spacious and comfortable interior
    • Reliability and well known Toyota quality

    Negative

    • High fuel consumption
    • Outdated internal technology
    • Less stability at high speeds

    Positive

    • No data found

    Negative

    • No data found

    Related comparisons

    Editor's PickTang L EV 670 Standard

    Expert / Editor Recommendation

    Choose Toyota Fortuner 2.7L EXR if you care more about overall equipment; choose Tang L EV 670 Standard if you care more about price.

    Popular Car Comparisons

    Toyota | Toyota Fortuner 2.7L EXR

    VS

    Exeed | VX Luxury 2.0T

    Toyota | Toyota Fortuner 2.7L EXR

    VS

    Exeed | Exeed VX 2023 2.0T-GDI Luxury

    Toyota | Toyota Fortuner 2.7L EXR

    VS

    Exeed | Exeed VX 2024 2.0T-GDI Luxury

    Toyota | Toyota Fortuner 2.7L EXR

    VS

    Jeep | Cherokee 3.2L Limited

    Toyota | Toyota Fortuner 2.7L EXR

    VS

    Haval | H9 Super Dignity

    Q&A

    • According to fuel consumption data, Toyota Fortuner 2.7L EXR has a fuel consumption of 9.62, while Tang L EV 670 Standard has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
    • In terms of interior space, Toyota Fortuner 2.7L EXR has a wheelbase of 2750 mm , while Tang L EV 670 Standard has a wheelbase of 2950. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Tang L EV 670 Standard, offers more room.
    • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Toyota Fortuner 2.7L EXR uses All Wheel Drive , while Tang L EV 670 Standard uses No data.