Toyota Fortuner 4.0L VXR vs 300 Challenger 2.0T Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
187 km/h
200 km/h
6
4
3956 cc
1998 cc
GCC
Chinese
Dimensions
7 Seater
5 Seater
5 Doors
5 Doors
4795 mm
4760 mm
1855 mm
1930 mm
1835 mm
1927 mm
2750 mm
2750 mm
348 L
400 L
220 mm
224 m
Fuel Economy
9.6 (KM/L)
10 Km/L
80 L
75 L
7 Km/L
10 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Smart Entry
Keyless Entry
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
Leather
Leather
Digital
Digital
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Manual
Electric
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
Standard
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
Android LCD
Android LCD
✓
✓
/
12.3
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
9
Transmission
No
/
6 Speed Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
Four Wheel Drive
McPherson Strut Coil Springs
/
Torsion Beam with Coil Springs
/
Electric Power Steering (EPS)
/
Key Spec
2.4 L - 4.0 L
2.0 L
147 BHP - 235 BHP
223 BHP - 342 BHP
6 Speed Automatic & 6-Speed Automatic Transmission & Automatic
Automatic
Petrol & Diesel & Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Hybrid
TBD
TBD
7 Seater - 7 Seater
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
LED
LED
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
V
In-Line
4.0 L
2.0 L
Petrol
Gasoline
4
4
235 BHP
224 BHP
376 Nm
387 Nm
/
Single Turbo
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Toyota Fortuner 4.0L VXR
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
300 Challenger 2.0T
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- Strong off-road performance
- Spacious and comfortable interior
- Reliability and well known Toyota quality
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- Outdated internal technology
- Less stability at high speeds
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Toyota Fortuner 4.0L VXR if you care more about overall equipment; choose 300 Challenger 2.0T if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Toyota Fortuner 4.0L VXR has a fuel consumption of 10.42, while 300 Challenger 2.0T has a fuel consumption of 10. Therefore, 300 Challenger 2.0T is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Toyota Fortuner 4.0L VXR has a wheelbase of 2750 mm , while 300 Challenger 2.0T has a wheelbase of 2750 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Toyota Fortuner 4.0L VXR uses All Wheel Drive , while 300 Challenger 2.0T uses Four Wheel Drive.