Toyota Rush 2024 1.5L GX vs Audi Q2 2017 Audi Q2 2017 30 TFSI Basic (116 HP) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
175
190
4
3
Dimensions
7 Seater
5 Seater
4435
4.191
1695
1.794
1705
1.508
2685
2.601
213
405
Fuel Economy
12.5
22.7
45
50
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Rear Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
1.5 L
1.0 L - 1.4 L
103 BHP
116 BHP - 150 BHP
Automatic
Automatic
Petrol
Petrol
TBD
TBD
7 Seater
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.5 L
1.0 L
Gasoline
Petrol
103 BHP
116 BHP
135
200
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Toyota Rush 2024 1.5L GX
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Rear Defogger
- Push Button Start
- Temperature Display
- Keyless Entry
- Welcome Light
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
Audi Q2 2017 Audi Q2 2017 30 TFSI Basic (116 HP)
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Welcome Light
- Steering Adjustment
- Number of Airbags
- Advanced Air Bags System (AABS)
- Speed Limiter
- Auto Door Lock
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- ABS
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- Modern and attractive design
- Spacious and comfortable interior
- Economical fuel efficiency
Negative
- Engine performance is poor at high speeds
- Low quality interior design
- Lack of modern technical features
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickAudi Q2 2017 Audi Q2 2017 30 TFSI Basic (116 HP)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Toyota Rush 2024 1.5L GX if you care more about interior space; choose Audi Q2 2017 Audi Q2 2017 30 TFSI Basic (116 HP) if you care more about fuel economy.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Toyota Rush 2024 1.5L GX has a fuel consumption of 8, while Audi Q2 2017 Audi Q2 2017 30 TFSI Basic (116 HP) has a fuel consumption of 4.41. Therefore, Audi Q2 2017 Audi Q2 2017 30 TFSI Basic (116 HP) is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Toyota Rush 2024 1.5L GX has a wheelbase of 2685, while Audi Q2 2017 Audi Q2 2017 30 TFSI Basic (116 HP) has a wheelbase of 2.601. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Toyota Rush 2024 1.5L GX, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Toyota Rush 2024 1.5L GX uses Rear Wheel Drive, while Audi Q2 2017 Audi Q2 2017 30 TFSI Basic (116 HP) uses Front Wheel Drive.