Traverse LT FWD vs 300 Challenger 2.0T Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
220 km/h
200 km/h
6
4
2498 cc
1998 cc
American
Chinese
Dimensions
7
5 Seater
5 Doors
5 Doors
5229 mm
4760 mm
1996 mm
1930 mm
1795 mm
1927 mm
3070 mm
2750 mm
651 L
400 L
190 mm
224 m
Fuel Economy
82 L
75 L
10 Km/L
10 Km/L
/
10 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Smart Entry
Keyless Entry
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
✓
Leather
Leather
Digital
Digital
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Electric
Electric
✓
✓
Standard
Standard
/
✓
/
✓
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Infotainment
✓
✓
Android LCD
Android LCD
✓
✓
/
12.3
/
✓
/
✓
/
9
Transmission
8 Speed AT
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Four Wheel Drive
McPherson Strut Coil Springs
/
Torsion Beam with Coil Springs
/
Electric Power Steering (EPS)
/
Key Spec
3.6 L
2.0 L
281 BHP - 310 BHP
217 BHP - 224 BHP
Automatic
Automatic
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline
TBD
TBD
7 Seater - 8 Seater
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
LED
LED
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
V
In-Line
2.5 T
2.0 L
Petrol
Gasoline
Single Turbo
Single Turbo
4
4
328 BHP
224 BHP
442 Nm
387 Nm
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Traverse LT FWD
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
300 Challenger 2.0T
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Traverse LT FWD if you care more about interior space; choose 300 Challenger 2.0T if you care more about overall equipment.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Traverse LT FWD has a fuel consumption of No data, while 300 Challenger 2.0T has a fuel consumption of 10. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Traverse LT FWD has a wheelbase of 3070 mm , while 300 Challenger 2.0T has a wheelbase of 2750 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Traverse LT FWD, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Traverse LT FWD uses Front Drive, while 300 Challenger 2.0T uses Four Wheel Drive.