Tucson 1.6L T-GDI 7DCT FWD Comfort vs Mazda CX-60 2024 3.3L e-Skyactiv-G V6 AWD Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
6
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
5
/
4640
4745
1865
1890
1665
1687
2755
2870
Fuel Economy
/
13.5
/
58
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
7-DCT
Automatic
/
✓
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
All Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Key Spec
1.6 L - 1999 L
3.3 L
130 BHP - 180 BHP
280 BHP
7-DCT & Automatic
Automatic
Gasoline & Petrol
Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
5 Seater
Engine
1.6 L
3.3 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
180 BHP
280 BHP
/
450
Exterior
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Technologies
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Tucson 1.6L T-GDI 7DCT FWD Comfort
Mazda CX-60 2024 3.3L e-Skyactiv-G V6 AWD
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree camera
- Push Button Start
- Temperature Display
- Keyless Entry
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Advanced Air Bags System (AABS)
- Security System
- Pedestrian airbag
- Fire Extinguisher
- Active Understeer Control (AUC)
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- Speed Limiter
- Auto Door Lock
- Spare Wheel
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Active braking
- Lane Departure Warning
Review Comparison
Positive
- Modern and attractive interior and exterior design
- Excellent riding comfort and stable driving experience
- Availability of advanced security and assistance technologies
Negative
- Internal details and quality of materials need to be improved
- Engine response and noise at high speeds
- Storage space is limited as much as
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickMazda CX-60 2024 3.3L e-Skyactiv-G V6 AWD
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Tucson 1.6L T-GDI 7DCT FWD Comfort if you care more about overall equipment; choose Mazda CX-60 2024 3.3L e-Skyactiv-G V6 AWD if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Tucson 1.6L T-GDI 7DCT FWD Comfort has a fuel consumption of No data, while Mazda CX-60 2024 3.3L e-Skyactiv-G V6 AWD has a fuel consumption of 7.41. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Tucson 1.6L T-GDI 7DCT FWD Comfort has a wheelbase of 2755, while Mazda CX-60 2024 3.3L e-Skyactiv-G V6 AWD has a wheelbase of 2870. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Mazda CX-60 2024 3.3L e-Skyactiv-G V6 AWD, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Tucson 1.6L T-GDI 7DCT FWD Comfort uses Front Drive, while Mazda CX-60 2024 3.3L e-Skyactiv-G V6 AWD uses All Wheel Drive.