Tucson 1.6L T-GDI 7DCT FWD Comfort vs Mazda CX-90 2024 3.3L High Plus Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
210
/
6
Dimensions
5 Seater
7 Seater
5
/
4640
5100
1865
1994
1665
1756
2755
3010
/
566
Fuel Economy
/
9.1
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
7-DCT
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
All Wheel Drive
/
✓
Key Spec
1.6 L - 1999 L
3.3 L
130 BHP - 180 BHP
345 BHP
7-DCT & Automatic
Automatic
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
7 Seater
Engine
1.6 L
3.3 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
180 BHP
345 BHP
/
500
Exterior
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Technologies
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Tucson 1.6L T-GDI 7DCT FWD Comfort
Mazda CX-90 2024 3.3L High Plus
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear AC Controls
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Advanced Air Bags System (AABS)
- Tire Repair Kit
- Security System
- Pedestrian airbag
- Fire Extinguisher
- Crosswind Assist
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- Speed Limiter
- Auto Door Lock
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Active braking
- Lane Departure Warning
Review Comparison
Positive
- Modern and attractive interior and exterior design
- Excellent riding comfort and stable driving experience
- Availability of advanced security and assistance technologies
Negative
- Internal details and quality of materials need to be improved
- Engine response and noise at high speeds
- Storage space is limited as much as
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickMazda CX-90 2024 3.3L High Plus
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Tucson 1.6L T-GDI 7DCT FWD Comfort if you care more about overall equipment; choose Mazda CX-90 2024 3.3L High Plus if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Tucson 1.6L T-GDI 7DCT FWD Comfort has a fuel consumption of No data, while Mazda CX-90 2024 3.3L High Plus has a fuel consumption of 10.99. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Tucson 1.6L T-GDI 7DCT FWD Comfort has a wheelbase of 2755, while Mazda CX-90 2024 3.3L High Plus has a wheelbase of 3010. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Mazda CX-90 2024 3.3L High Plus, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Tucson 1.6L T-GDI 7DCT FWD Comfort uses Front Drive, while Mazda CX-90 2024 3.3L High Plus uses All Wheel Drive.