Tucson 1.6L T-GDI 7DCT FWD Comfort vs Mazda CX3 2024 2.0L Comfort (FWD) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
190
/
4
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
5
/
4640
4.275
1865
1.765
1665
1.535
2755
2.570
/
✓
/
240
Fuel Economy
/
15.4
/
48
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
7-DCT
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Front Wheel Drive
/
✓
/
✓
Wheels/brakes
/
✓
/
✓
Key Spec
1.6 L - 1999 L
2.0 L - 2000 L
130 BHP - 180 BHP
110 BHP - 148 BHP
7-DCT & Automatic
Automatic
Gasoline & Petrol
Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
5 Seater
Engine
1.6 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Petrol
180 BHP
148 BHP
/
192
Exterior
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Technologies
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Tucson 1.6L T-GDI 7DCT FWD Comfort
Mazda CX3 2024 2.0L Comfort (FWD)
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- Rear Defogger
- Temperature Display
- Keyless Entry
- Welcome Light
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- Pedestrian airbag
- Fire Extinguisher
- Active Bonnet
- Collision Detection
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- Modern and attractive interior and exterior design
- Excellent riding comfort and stable driving experience
- Availability of advanced security and assistance technologies
Negative
- Internal details and quality of materials need to be improved
- Engine response and noise at high speeds
- Storage space is limited as much as
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickMazda CX3 2024 2.0L Comfort (FWD)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Tucson 1.6L T-GDI 7DCT FWD Comfort if you care more about interior space; choose Mazda CX3 2024 2.0L Comfort (FWD) if you care more about overall equipment.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Tucson 1.6L T-GDI 7DCT FWD Comfort has a fuel consumption of No data, while Mazda CX3 2024 2.0L Comfort (FWD) has a fuel consumption of 6.49. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Tucson 1.6L T-GDI 7DCT FWD Comfort has a wheelbase of 2755, while Mazda CX3 2024 2.0L Comfort (FWD) has a wheelbase of 2.570. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Tucson 1.6L T-GDI 7DCT FWD Comfort, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Tucson 1.6L T-GDI 7DCT FWD Comfort uses Front Drive, while Mazda CX3 2024 2.0L Comfort (FWD) uses Front Wheel Drive.