Urban Cruiser GL vs Commander Limited Plus Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

4

/

Dimensions

5 Seater

7

17

/

4365

/

1795

/

1645

/

2600

/

210

/

Fuel Economy

19.8

/

45 L

/

Comfort

/

/

/

/

Keyless Entry

/

/

/

Interior

7

/

/

Fabric

/

/

/

/

/

/

Rear

/

Safety

/

Driver And Front Passenger + Side + Curtain

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

9

10

/

/

/

4

/

Transmission

/

6 Speed Automatic Transmission

/

Chassis & Steering

Front Wheel Drive

/

Wheels/brakes

215/60 R17

/

215/60 R17

/

/

Key Spec

1.5 L - 1.5 L

2.0

101 - 101

272

6 Speed Automatic Transmission & Automatic

TBD

Gasoline

Gasoline

TBD

TBD

5 - 5

7

Exterior

/

/

/

LED

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

1.5 L

2.0

Gasoline

Gasoline

101 BHP

272

135

400

Technologies

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Urban Cruiser GL

    • Electronic Engine Immobilizer
    • Push Button Start
    • Keyless Entry
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Rear Camera
    • Remote key types
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Number of Airbags
    • Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
    • Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
    • ABS
  • Commander Limited Plus

    • Keyless Entry
    • Keyless Start
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
    • Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
    • Child Lock
    • Speed Alert
    • Lane Keeping Assist
    • Seat belt reminder

Review Comparison

Positive

  • Stylish exterior design meets the taste of youth
  • Economical fuel consumption suitable for daily commuting
  • Reliable service network and rich security features

Negative

  • The engine performance is average, especially at high speeds
  • Limited back row space for large families
  • The entertainment and control system is simple compared to competitors

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickUrban Cruiser GL

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Urban Cruiser GL if you care more about price; choose Commander Limited Plus if you care more about power.

Popular Car Comparisons

Toyota | Urban Cruiser GL

VS

Haval | Haval Jolion 2023 1.5T Active Plus

Toyota | Urban Cruiser GL

VS

Hyundai | Hyundai Santa Fe 2018 2.4L FWD

Toyota | Urban Cruiser GL

VS

MG | MG HS 2020 2.0T Comfort

Toyota | Urban Cruiser GL

VS

MG | RX5 1.5T STD

Toyota | Urban Cruiser GL

VS

MG | HS 1.5 DCT DEL

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Urban Cruiser GL has a fuel consumption of 5.05, while Commander Limited Plus has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Urban Cruiser GL has a wheelbase of 2600, while Commander Limited Plus has a wheelbase of No data. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Urban Cruiser GL uses Front Wheel Drive, while Commander Limited Plus uses No data.