VF9 2025 Eco vs CS75 PLUS SPORT Comparison

Car Information

6.6

/

531

/

123

/

Dimensions

7

5

20

/

5119

4700

2004

1865

1691

1710

3148

2710

212

/

Fuel Economy

75

58

/

/

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Smart Key

Interior

Front & Back Row Seats

Front Row Seats

Front Row Seats

/

/

/

Triple

/

/

/

/

12

/

Front Row Seats

/

LCD

/

Driver Seat

/

Leather

/

/

Safety

/

11

6

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

15.6

12

6

8

/

/

SONY

Transmission

DHT

8-Speed Automatic

/

8

Chassis & Steering

Four-Wheel Drive

Front Drive

Independent, Double Wishbone

/

Multi-link with Air Spring

/

Wheels/brakes

/

/

/

/

225/55 R19

/

225/55 R19

Key Spec

TBD

/

402 BHP

229 BHP - 233 BHP

DHT

8-Speed Automatic

Electric

Gasoline

TBD

/

7

5

/

2.0 L

/

TBD

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

Electric

/

/

/

/

/

LED

Engine

/

2.0 L

Electric

Gasoline

402 BHP

233 BHP

620

390

/

2.0T GDI

Motor

Dual Motor

/

Technologies

/

/

/

Eco / Normal / Sport

Normal, Economy

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • VF9 2025 Eco

    • Electronic Engine Immobilizer
    • Power Tailgate
    • Push Button Start
    • Keyless Entry
    • Keyless Start
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Number of Airbags
    • Pedestrian airbag
    • Collision Detection
    • Blind Spot Warning
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • Lane Departure Warning
  • CS75 PLUS SPORT

    • Power Tailgate
    • 360 Degree Camera
    • Cool Box
    • Push Button Start
    • Keyless Entry
    • Welcome Light
    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Keyless Start
    • Remote key types
    • Rear Cross Traffic Alert
    • Number of Airbags
    • Collision Detection
    • Blind Spot Warning
    • Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
    • Lane Departure Warning
    • Lane Keeping Assist

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickVF9 2025 Eco

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose VF9 2025 Eco if you care more about price; choose CS75 PLUS SPORT if you care more about overall equipment.

Popular Car Comparisons

Vinfast | VF9 2025 Eco

VS

MG | MG ZS 2020 1.3T ZST

Vinfast | VF9 2025 Eco

VS

Renault | Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) 2025

Vinfast | VF9 2025 Eco

VS

Renault | All-New Duster PE 1.6L 4×2 CVT

Vinfast | VF9 2025 Eco

VS

Renault | Renault Duster 2018 2.0L PE (4x2)

Vinfast | VF9 2025 Eco

VS

BAIC | BAIC X35 2023 1.5L Elite

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, VF9 2025 Eco has a fuel consumption of No data, while CS75 PLUS SPORT has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, VF9 2025 Eco has a wheelbase of 3148, while CS75 PLUS SPORT has a wheelbase of 2710. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, VF9 2025 Eco, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. VF9 2025 Eco uses Four-Wheel Drive, while CS75 PLUS SPORT uses Front Drive.