VF9 2025 Eco vs Sportage L 1.5T 2WD TX Comparison

Car Information

6.6

/

531

/

123

/

Dimensions

7

5

20

17

5119

4670

2004

1865

1691

1660

3148

2755

212

/

/

Flush Door

/

5

Fuel Economy

75

/

/

/

Comfort

✓

/

✓

/

✓

✓

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

/

✓

/

Smart Key

Interior

Front & Back Row Seats

/

Front Row Seats

/

✓

/

✓

✓

✓

/

Triple

/

✓

✓

✓

/

✓

✓

✓

✓

✓

/

✓

✓

/

✓

/

12.3

/

Front Row Seats

/

Cloth

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

Safety

✓

/

11

Front & Thorax Airbags

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

✓

✓

/

✓

✓

✓

/

/

Full Size

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

Infotainment

15.6

12.3

✓

✓

6

/

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

Transmission

DHT

8-Speed Automatic

/

✓

Chassis & Steering

Four-Wheel Drive

/

Independent, Double Wishbone

/

Multi-link with Air Spring

/

Wheels/brakes

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

Key Spec

TBD

/

402 BHP

197 BHP - 200 BHP

DHT

8-SPEED AT (E-Shift/ SBW) & 8-SPEED AT (E-Shift/ SBW)

Electric

Gasoline

TBD

/

7

5

/

1.5 L - 1.5 L

/

TBD

Exterior

✓

✓

✓

✓

✓

✓

✓

✓

✓

✓

✓

✓

✓

✓

✓

/

/

✓

/

/

/

✓

Engine

/

1.5 L

Electric

Gasoline

402 BHP

197 BHP

620

253

Motor

Dual Motor

/

Technologies

✓

/

✓

/

✓

✓

✓

✓

Eco / Normal / Sport

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

✓

✓

✓

/

✓

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • VF9 2025 Eco

    • Electronic Engine Immobilizer
    • Power Tailgate
    • Push Button Start
    • Keyless Entry
    • Keyless Start
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Number of Airbags
    • Pedestrian airbag
    • Collision Detection
    • Blind Spot Warning
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • Lane Departure Warning
  • Sportage L 1.5T 2WD TX

    • Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
    • Push Button Start
    • Remote key types
    • Number of Airbags
    • Spare Wheel
    • Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickSportage L 1.5T 2WD TX

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose VF9 2025 Eco if you care more about interior space; choose Sportage L 1.5T 2WD TX if you care more about overall equipment.

Popular Car Comparisons

Vinfast | VF9 2025 Eco

VS

MG | MG ZS 2020 1.3T ZST

Vinfast | VF9 2025 Eco

VS

Renault | Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) 2025

Vinfast | VF9 2025 Eco

VS

Renault | All-New Duster PE 1.6L 4×2 CVT

Vinfast | VF9 2025 Eco

VS

Renault | Renault Duster 2018 2.0L PE (4x2)

Vinfast | VF9 2025 Eco

VS

BAIC | BAIC X35 2023 1.5L Elite

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, VF9 2025 Eco has a fuel consumption of No data, while Sportage L 1.5T 2WD TX has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, VF9 2025 Eco has a wheelbase of 3148, while Sportage L 1.5T 2WD TX has a wheelbase of 2755. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, VF9 2025 Eco, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. VF9 2025 Eco uses Four-Wheel Drive, while Sportage L 1.5T 2WD TX uses No data.