VGV VX7 vs Landtrek 2.4T DC 4x2 (M/T) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
210
182 km/h
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
5010
5330 mm
1870
1963 mm
1730
1897 mm
2800
3180 mm
Fuel Economy
58
80 L
/
10.2 Km/L
/
10.2 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
TCS
/
✓
/
Infotainment
✓
/
Transmission
8AT
/
Chassis & Steering
/
Rear Wheel Drive
Exterior
✓
/
/
/
/
✓
Engine
2.0 L
2.4 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
2.0T GDI
/
165/5500
/
385
320 Nm
385/1800-3600
/
/
210 BHP
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Key Spec
/
1.9 L - 2.4 L
/
150 BHP - 210 BHP
/
Automatic & Manual
/
Diesel & Gasoline & Petrol
/
TBD
/
5 Seater
Comparison of configuration highlights
VGV VX7
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
Landtrek 2.4T DC 4x2 (M/T)
- 360 Degree camera
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickLandtrek 2.4T DC 4x2 (M/T)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose VGV VX7 if you care more about overall equipment; choose Landtrek 2.4T DC 4x2 (M/T) if you care more about interior space.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, VGV VX7 has a fuel consumption of No data, while Landtrek 2.4T DC 4x2 (M/T) has a fuel consumption of 9.8. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, VGV VX7 has a wheelbase of 2800, while Landtrek 2.4T DC 4x2 (M/T) has a wheelbase of 3180 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Landtrek 2.4T DC 4x2 (M/T), offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. VGV VX7 uses No data, while Landtrek 2.4T DC 4x2 (M/T) uses Rear Wheel Drive.