View CS2 Mini Bus vs Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
145 km/h
161 km/h
Dimensions
15 Seater
5 Seater
5600 mm
4341 mm
2255 mm
1804 mm
2285 mm
1693 mm
3110 mm
2676 mm
/
414 L
Fuel Economy
8.8 Km/L
17.2 Km/L
8.8 Km/L
17.2 Km/L
/
50 L
Safety
✓
✓
Chassis & Steering
Rear Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.2 L - 2.4 L
1.6 L - 2.0 L
76 BHP - 134 BHP
105 BHP - 135 BHP
TBD
Automatic & CVT & Manual
Gasoline
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
2 Seater - 15 Seater
5 - 5
Exterior
✓
/
Engine
2.4 L
1.6 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
134 BHP
115 BHP
200 Nm
156 Nm
Comparison of configuration highlights
View CS2 Mini Bus
- ABS
Duster 1.6L PE (4x2)
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickView CS2 Mini Bus
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose View CS2 Mini Bus if you care more about price; choose Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) if you care more about fuel economy.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, View CS2 Mini Bus has a fuel consumption of 11.36, while Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) has a fuel consumption of 5.81. Therefore, Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, View CS2 Mini Bus has a wheelbase of 3110 mm, while Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) has a wheelbase of 2676 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, View CS2 Mini Bus, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. View CS2 Mini Bus uses Rear Wheel Drive, while Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) uses Front Wheel Drive.