Volkswagen Phaeton 2016 V6 vs Arrizo 5 Pro Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
250
/
6
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5
5059
4572
1903
1825
1450
1482
2881
2670
500
/
/
16inch
Fuel Economy
8.8
15
90
/
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
Driver Seat
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
3.5
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
4
Transmission
✓
/
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
✓
/
All Wheel Drive
Front Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
/
✓
/
235/50 R19
/
235/50 R19
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
3.2 L
1.5
Gasoline
Gasoline
280 BHP
116
370
143
/
85
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Key Spec
/
1.5
/
116
/
Automatic
/
Gasoline
/
TBD
/
5
Comparison of configuration highlights
Volkswagen Phaeton 2016 V6
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Rear Defogger
- Rear AC Controls
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Seats - Comfort
- Steering Adjustment
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
Arrizo 5 Pro
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Power Tailgate
- Electric Locks
- Seats - Comfort
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Lane Following Assist
- Driving Recorder
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
- Active Safety Warning System
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
- Lane Departure Warning
- Lane Keeping Assist
- Seat belt reminder
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickArrizo 5 Pro
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Volkswagen Phaeton 2016 V6 if you care more about interior space; choose Arrizo 5 Pro if you care more about fuel economy.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Volkswagen Phaeton 2016 V6 has a fuel consumption of 11.36, while Arrizo 5 Pro has a fuel consumption of 6.67. Therefore, Arrizo 5 Pro is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Volkswagen Phaeton 2016 V6 has a wheelbase of 2881, while Arrizo 5 Pro has a wheelbase of 2670. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Volkswagen Phaeton 2016 V6, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Volkswagen Phaeton 2016 V6 uses All Wheel Drive, while Arrizo 5 Pro uses Front Drive.