Volkswagen Polo 2018 Sedan S vs Ciciv SPORT Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
185
200
4
/
Dimensions
4 Seater
5
4384
4689
1699
1801
1465
1415
2552
,735
455
/
Fuel Economy
14.3
/
55
47
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
Front Row Seats
/
Front Row Seats
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
8
/
✓
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
/
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
Key Spec
1.6 L
1.5 L - 2.0 L
105 BHP
123 BHP - 180 BHP
Automatic
Automatic & CVT
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
4 Seater
5 - 5
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.6 L
2.0
Gasoline
Gasoline
105 BHP
150
153
181
/
112
/
6400
/
5000
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Volkswagen Polo 2018 Sedan S
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Steering Adjustment
- ABS
Ciciv SPORT
- Push Button Start
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Cross Traffic Alert
- Child Safety Monitoring System
- Collision Safety Door Latch Open System
- Collision Safety Cut-Out
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Driving Recorder
- Security System
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- ABS
- EBA/BA
- Lane Departure Warning
- Lane Keeping Assist
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- High fuel efficiency
- Long lasting reliability
- High quality interior design
Negative
- Limited rear space for passengers
- Average off road performance
- An insufficiently innovative infotainment system
Related comparisons
Editor's PickCiciv SPORT
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Volkswagen Polo 2018 Sedan S if you care more about interior space; choose Ciciv SPORT if you care more about power.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Volkswagen Polo 2018 Sedan S has a fuel consumption of 6.99, while Ciciv SPORT has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Volkswagen Polo 2018 Sedan S has a wheelbase of 2552, while Ciciv SPORT has a wheelbase of ,735. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Volkswagen Polo 2018 Sedan S, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Volkswagen Polo 2018 Sedan S uses Front Wheel Drive, while Ciciv SPORT uses No data.