EX30 Core vs Alreem 2.0T High Line (4x4) Comparison
Car Information
Dimensions
5
7 Seater
4233
4771 mm
1837
1870 mm
1549
1828 mm
2650
2790 mm
234
/
Fuel Economy
/
10 Km/L
/
10 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
344
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Transmission
dht
/
Chassis & Steering
Rear Drive
All Wheel Drive
Key Spec
TBD
/
272 BHP - 428 BHP
/
dht & DHT
/
Electric
/
TBD
/
5 - 5
/
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
/
2.0 L
Electric
Gasoline
272 BHP
215 BHP
343
280 Nm
Motor
Single
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
EX30 Core
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- 360 Degree Camera
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Rear Camera
- Number of Airbags
- Pedestrian airbag
- Fire Extinguisher
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
Alreem 2.0T High Line (4x4)
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickAlreem 2.0T High Line (4x4)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose EX30 Core if you care more about power; choose Alreem 2.0T High Line (4x4) if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, EX30 Core has a fuel consumption of No data, while Alreem 2.0T High Line (4x4) has a fuel consumption of 10. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, EX30 Core has a wheelbase of 2650, while Alreem 2.0T High Line (4x4) has a wheelbase of 2790 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Alreem 2.0T High Line (4x4), offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. EX30 Core uses Rear Drive, while Alreem 2.0T High Line (4x4) uses All Wheel Drive.