Wrangler Sahara 2.0T vs Mercedes Benz GLB Class 2024 250 4MATIC Comparison

Car Information

/

6.9

Engine / Motor

200 km/h

236

4

4

1998 cc

/

GCC

/

Dimensions

5 Seater

/

4 Doors

/

4785 mm

4.634

1877 mm

1.834

1869 mm

1.662

3007 mm

2.829

487 L

570

254 m

/

Fuel Economy

7 Km/L

13.9

87 L

60

7 Km/L

/

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

Keyless Entry

/

/

/

/

/

/

Interior

/

/

Leather

/

Digital

/

Single

/

/

/

/

/

Electric

/

/

/

Standard

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

12

/

/

/

/

Android LCD

/

/

8

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Transmission

/

/

Automatic

Chassis & Steering

Front Wheel Drive

All Wheel Drive

/

/

Key Spec

2.0 L - 6.4 L

1.3 L - 2.0 L

270 BHP - 470

163 BHP - 306 BHP

8AT & Automatic & Manual

7-speed dual-clutch automatic & 8-speed automatic & Automatic

Petrol & Gasoline & Petrol

Gasoline & Petrol

TBD

TBD

4 - 5 Seater

5 - 7 Seater

Exterior

/

/

/

Halogen

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

In-Line

/

2.0 L

2.0 L

Gasoline

Petrol

Twin Turbo

/

4

/

270 BHP

224 BHP

400 Nm

350

Technologies

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Wrangler Sahara 2.0T

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Rear Defogger
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Keyless Start
    • Heater
    • Rear Camera
    • Headlight On Reminder
    • Remote key types
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Lock
    • Speed Alert
    • Active braking
  • Mercedes Benz GLB Class 2024 250 4MATIC

    • Electronic Engine Immobilizer
    • 360 Degree Camera
    • Push Button Start
    • Keyless Entry
    • Rear Camera
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Number of Airbags
    • Pedestrian airbag
    • Fire Extinguisher
    • Collision Detection
    • Spare Wheel
    • Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • Active braking

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickWrangler Sahara 2.0T

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Wrangler Sahara 2.0T if you care more about price; choose Mercedes Benz GLB Class 2024 250 4MATIC if you care more about fuel economy.

Popular Car Comparisons

Jeep | Wrangler Sahara 2.0T

VS

Jeep | Jeep Wrangler Rubicon 3.6L 4 Door

Jeep | Wrangler Sahara 2.0T

VS

Audi | Q5 45 TFSI quattro Advanced 2.0L (245 HP)

Jeep | Wrangler Sahara 2.0T

VS

Genesis | Genesis GV80 2023 2.5T Premium

Jeep | Wrangler Sahara 2.0T

VS

Toyota | Toyota Land Cruiser 2022 4.0L GXR

Jeep | Wrangler Sahara 2.0T

VS

Toyota | Toyota Land Cruiser 2018 4.0L GXR

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Wrangler Sahara 2.0T has a fuel consumption of 14.29, while Mercedes Benz GLB Class 2024 250 4MATIC has a fuel consumption of 7.19. Therefore, Mercedes Benz GLB Class 2024 250 4MATIC is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Wrangler Sahara 2.0T has a wheelbase of 3007 mm, while Mercedes Benz GLB Class 2024 250 4MATIC has a wheelbase of 2.829. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Wrangler Sahara 2.0T, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Wrangler Sahara 2.0T uses Front Wheel Drive, while Mercedes Benz GLB Class 2024 250 4MATIC uses All Wheel Drive.