X-TRAIL S 2WD 5 Seats vs BYD Ti7 Design Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
190
Dimensions
5 Seater
5
17
19"
4
/
4680
5016
2065
1995
1730
1865
2705
2920
212
190
/
2425
/
1800L
/
5.7
/
24
/
25
Fuel Economy
16.1
/
55
60
Comfort
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
Smart Key
/
/
✓
Interior
7
/
✓
/
✓
/
TFT
/
Front Row Seats
/
Fabric
PU
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
Front Row Seats
/
Front Row Seats
/
All Seats
/
Front Row Seats
/
✓
/
Dual
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
Driver + Passenger + Side + Curtain
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
✓
4
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Battery/Charging
/
54
/
6.6
Transmission
✓
/
✓
/
Xtronic CVT
AT
Chassis & Steering
✓
/
Front Drive
Four-Wheel Drive
Independent strut
Double wishbone type
Multi Link
Five-link
/
AWD
Wheels/brakes
Disc
Ventilated
Disc
Ventilated
/
60 /255 R19
/
60 /255 R19
Key Spec
2.5 L
/
132 BHP - 188 BHP
/
Automatic & CVT & Xtronic CVT
/
Gasoline & Petrol
/
TBD
/
5 Seater - 7 Seater
/
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.5 L
1.5T / PHEV
Gasoline
Hybrid
DIG 16-valve 4-cylinder
/
181 BHP
480
181 @ 6,000
/
244
630
244 @ 4,000
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
AUTO-ECO-SPORT
Sport / Normal / Eco
Manual
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
X-TRAIL S 2WD 5 Seats
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Parking sensor rear
- Keyless Start
- Remote key types
- Number of Airbags
- ABS
- EBA/BA
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Child Lock
BYD Ti7 Design
- Power Tailgate
- Keyless Entry
- Keyless Start
- Emergency Lane Keeping (ELK）
- Lane Following Assist
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Child Lock
- Lane Departure Warning
- Lane Keeping Assist
- Seat belt reminder
- Remote Central Door Locking
Review Comparison
Positive
- Excellent off-road driving performance and stable control
- Spacious interior space suitable for families and luggage
- High safety equipment increases confidence while driving
Negative
- Motor performance is less responsive in acceleration
- Fuel consumption is high in the city
- The quality of interior materials and technology need to be improved
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose X-TRAIL S 2WD 5 Seats if you care more about overall equipment; choose BYD Ti7 Design if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, X-TRAIL S 2WD 5 Seats has a fuel consumption of 6.21, while BYD Ti7 Design has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, X-TRAIL S 2WD 5 Seats has a wheelbase of 2705, while BYD Ti7 Design has a wheelbase of 2920. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, BYD Ti7 Design, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. X-TRAIL S 2WD 5 Seats uses Front Drive, while BYD Ti7 Design uses Four-Wheel Drive.