X-TRAIL S 2WD 5 Seats vs Outlander 2.5L GLX Mid Line Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
200 km/h
Dimensions
5 Seater
7 Seater
17
/
4
/
4680
4709 mm
2065
1897 mm
1730
1745 mm
2705
2705 mm
212
/
/
331 L
Fuel Economy
16.1
14.7 Km/L
55
55 L
/
14.7 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Smart Key
/
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
7
/
✓
/
✓
/
TFT
/
Front Row Seats
/
Fabric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
Driver + Passenger + Side + Curtain
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
/
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
4
/
Transmission
✓
/
✓
/
Xtronic CVT
/
Chassis & Steering
✓
/
Front Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Independent strut
/
Multi Link
/
Wheels/brakes
Disc
/
Disc
/
Key Spec
2.5 L
2.4 L - 3.0 L
132 BHP - 188 BHP
165 BHP - 236 BHP
Automatic & CVT & Xtronic CVT
Automatic & CVT
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Hybrid & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater - 7 Seater
5 - 7
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Engine
2.5 L
2.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
DIG 16-valve 4-cylinder
/
181 BHP
181 BHP
181 @ 6,000
/
244
245 Nm
244 @ 4,000
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
AUTO-ECO-SPORT
/
Manual
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
X-TRAIL S 2WD 5 Seats
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Parking sensor rear
- Keyless Start
- Remote key types
- Number of Airbags
- ABS
- EBA/BA
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Child Lock
Outlander 2.5L GLX Mid Line
- 360 Degree camera
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- Excellent off-road driving performance and stable control
- Spacious interior space suitable for families and luggage
- High safety equipment increases confidence while driving
Negative
- Motor performance is less responsive in acceleration
- Fuel consumption is high in the city
- The quality of interior materials and technology need to be improved
Positive
- Spacious interior space
- Integrated specifications
- Competitive price value
Negative
- Engine performance is moderate
- Limited driving experience
- Traditional interior design
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose X-TRAIL S 2WD 5 Seats if you care more about fuel economy; choose Outlander 2.5L GLX Mid Line if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, X-TRAIL S 2WD 5 Seats has a fuel consumption of 6.21, while Outlander 2.5L GLX Mid Line has a fuel consumption of 6.8. Therefore, X-TRAIL S 2WD 5 Seats is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, X-TRAIL S 2WD 5 Seats has a wheelbase of 2705, while Outlander 2.5L GLX Mid Line has a wheelbase of 2705 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. X-TRAIL S 2WD 5 Seats uses Front Drive, while Outlander 2.5L GLX Mid Line uses Front Wheel Drive.