X-TRAIL S 2WD 5 Seats vs X-TRAIL S 2WD 7 Seats Comparison
Car Information
Dimensions
5 Seater
7 Seater
17
17
4
4
4680
4680
2065
2065
1730
1730
2705
2705
212
212
Fuel Economy
16.1
16.1
55
55
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Smart Key
Smart Key
Interior
7
7
✓
✓
✓
✓
TFT
TFT
Front Row Seats
Front Row Seats
Fabric
Fabric
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Safety
Driver + Passenger + Side + Curtain
Driver + Passenger + Side + Curtain
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
Infotainment
✓
✓
✓
✓
4
4
Transmission
✓
✓
✓
✓
Xtronic CVT
CVT
Chassis & Steering
✓
✓
Front Drive
Front Drive
Independent strut
Independent strut
Multi Link
Multi Link
Wheels/brakes
Disc
Disc
Disc
Disc
Key Spec
2.5 L
2.5 L
132 BHP - 188 BHP
132 BHP - 188 BHP
Automatic & CVT & Xtronic CVT
Automatic & CVT & Xtronic CVT
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater - 7 Seater
5 Seater - 7 Seater
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Engine
2.5 L
2.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
DIG 16-valve 4-cylinder
DIG 16-valve 4-cylinder
181 BHP
181 BHP
181 @ 6,000
181 @ 6,000
244
244
244 @ 4,000
244 @ 4,000
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
AUTO-ECO-SPORT
AUTO-ECO-SPORT
Manual
Manual
✓
✓
✓
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
X-TRAIL S 2WD 5 Seats
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Parking sensor rear
- Keyless Start
- Remote key types
- Number of Airbags
- ABS
- EBA/BA
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Child Lock
X-TRAIL S 2WD 7 Seats
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Parking sensor rear
- Keyless Start
- Remote key types
- Number of Airbags
- ABS
- EBA/BA
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Child Lock
Review Comparison
Positive
- Excellent off-road driving performance and stable control
- Spacious interior space suitable for families and luggage
- High safety equipment increases confidence while driving
Negative
- Motor performance is less responsive in acceleration
- Fuel consumption is high in the city
- The quality of interior materials and technology need to be improved
Positive
- Excellent off-road driving performance and stable control
- Spacious interior space suitable for families and luggage
- High safety equipment increases confidence while driving
Negative
- Motor performance is less responsive in acceleration
- Fuel consumption is high in the city
- The quality of interior materials and technology need to be improved
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose X-TRAIL S 2WD 5 Seats if you care more about overall equipment; choose X-TRAIL S 2WD 7 Seats if you care more about overall equipment.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, X-TRAIL S 2WD 5 Seats has a fuel consumption of 6.21, while X-TRAIL S 2WD 7 Seats has a fuel consumption of 6.21. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, X-TRAIL S 2WD 5 Seats has a wheelbase of 2705, while X-TRAIL S 2WD 7 Seats has a wheelbase of 2705. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. X-TRAIL S 2WD 5 Seats uses Front Drive, while X-TRAIL S 2WD 7 Seats uses Front Drive.