X-TRAIL S 2WD 5 Seats vs X5 M50i xDrive Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
250 km/h
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
17
/
4
/
4680
4922 mm
2065
2004 mm
1730
1745 mm
2705
2975 mm
212
/
/
645 L
Fuel Economy
16.1
9.5 Km/L
55
83 L
/
9.5 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Smart Key
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
7
/
✓
/
✓
/
TFT
/
Front Row Seats
/
Fabric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Safety
Driver + Passenger + Side + Curtain
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
/
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
4
/
Transmission
✓
/
✓
/
Xtronic CVT
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
✓
/
Front Drive
All Wheel Drive
Independent strut
/
Multi Link
/
Wheels/brakes
Disc
/
Disc
/
Key Spec
2.5 L
3.0 L - 4800 L
181 BHP - 188 BHP
235 BHP - 530 BHP
CVT & Xtronic CVT
Automatic & CVT
Gasoline & Petrol
Diesel & Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater - 7 Seater
5 Seater - 7 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Engine
2.5 L
4.4 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
DIG 16-valve 4-cylinder
/
181 BHP
530 BHP
181 @ 6,000
/
244
750 Nm
244 @ 4,000
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
AUTO-ECO-SPORT
/
Manual
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
X-TRAIL S 2WD 5 Seats
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Parking sensor rear
- Keyless Start
- Remote key types
- Number of Airbags
- ABS
- EBA/BA
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Child Lock
X5 M50i xDrive
- 360 Degree camera
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- Excellent off-road driving performance and stable control
- Spacious interior space suitable for families and luggage
- High safety equipment increases confidence while driving
Negative
- Motor performance is less responsive in acceleration
- Fuel consumption is high in the city
- The quality of interior materials and technology need to be improved
Positive
- The power of dynamic performance
- Luxurious interior design and advanced equipment
- Convenient and thoughtful space distribution
Negative
- High purchase and maintenance costs
- Fuel economy is lower than expected
- Complexity in the operation of electronic systems
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose X-TRAIL S 2WD 5 Seats if you care more about price; choose X5 M50i xDrive if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, X-TRAIL S 2WD 5 Seats has a fuel consumption of 6.21, while X5 M50i xDrive has a fuel consumption of 10.53. Therefore, X-TRAIL S 2WD 5 Seats is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, X-TRAIL S 2WD 5 Seats has a wheelbase of 2705, while X5 M50i xDrive has a wheelbase of 2975 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, X5 M50i xDrive, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. X-TRAIL S 2WD 5 Seats uses Front Drive, while X5 M50i xDrive uses All Wheel Drive.