X-TRAIL S 2WD 7 Seats vs X-TRAIL S 2WD 7 Seats Comparison
Car Information
SUV
/
Dimensions
7 Seater
/
17
/
4
/
4680
/
2065
/
1730
/
2705
/
212
/
Fuel Economy
16.1
/
55
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Key
/
Interior
7
/
✓
/
✓
/
TFT
/
Front Row Seats
/
Fabric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
Driver + Passenger + Side + Curtain
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
/
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
4
/
Transmission
✓
/
✓
/
CVT
/
Chassis & Steering
✓
/
Front Drive
/
Independent strut
/
Multi Link
/
Wheels/brakes
Disc
/
Disc
/
Key Spec
2.5 L
/
132 BHP - 188 BHP
/
Automatic & CVT & Xtronic CVT
/
Gasoline & Petrol
/
TBD
/
5 Seater - 7 Seater
/
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
2.5 L
/
Gasoline
/
DIG 16-valve 4-cylinder
/
181 BHP
/
181 @ 6,000
/
244
/
244 @ 4,000
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
AUTO-ECO-SPORT
/
Manual
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
X-TRAIL S 2WD 7 Seats
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Parking sensor rear
- Keyless Start
- Remote key types
- Number of Airbags
- ABS
- EBA/BA
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Child Lock
X-TRAIL S 2WD 7 Seats
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Parking sensor rear
- Keyless Start
- Remote key types
- Number of Airbags
- ABS
- EBA/BA
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Child Lock
Review Comparison
Positive
- Excellent off-road driving performance and stable control
- Spacious interior space suitable for families and luggage
- High safety equipment increases confidence while driving
Negative
- Motor performance is less responsive in acceleration
- Fuel consumption is high in the city
- The quality of interior materials and technology need to be improved
Positive
- Excellent off-road driving performance and stable control
- Spacious interior space suitable for families and luggage
- High safety equipment increases confidence while driving
Negative
- Motor performance is less responsive in acceleration
- Fuel consumption is high in the city
- The quality of interior materials and technology need to be improved
Related comparisons
Editor's PickX-TRAIL S 2WD 7 Seats
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose X-TRAIL S 2WD 7 Seats if you care more about overall equipment; choose X-TRAIL S 2WD 7 Seats if you care more about overall equipment.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, X-TRAIL S 2WD 7 Seats has a fuel consumption of 6.21, while X-TRAIL S 2WD 7 Seats has a fuel consumption of 6.21. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, X-TRAIL S 2WD 7 Seats has a wheelbase of 2705, while X-TRAIL S 2WD 7 Seats has a wheelbase of 2705. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. X-TRAIL S 2WD 7 Seats uses Front Drive, while X-TRAIL S 2WD 7 Seats uses Front Drive.