X35 Fashion Plus MT vs Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

/

161 km/h

Dimensions

5

5 Seater

1340

/

16

/

4286

4341 mm

1815

1804 mm

1665

1693 mm

2560

2676 mm

1765

/

390

414 L

180

/

Fuel Economy

46

50 L

/

17.2 Km/L

/

17.2 Km/L

Comfort

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

Interior

Front Row Seats

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

Driver

/

Safety

✓

/

Driver And Passenger Airbag

/

T125/80 R15

/

✓

/

✓

✓

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

Front

/

Infotainment

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

4

/

Transmission

6MT

/

Chassis & Steering

Front Drive

Front Wheel Drive

MacPhersan

/

H torsion beam type

/

Wheels/brakes

✓

/

Solid Disc

/

205/60 R16

/

205/60 R16

/

Key Spec

1500 L - 1500 L

1.6 L - 1998 L

134 - 150

105 BHP - 135 BHP

6MT & CVT & CVT

Automatic & CVT & Manual

Gasoline & Petrol

Gasoline & Petrol

TBD

TBD

5 - 5

5 - 5

Exterior

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

Engine

1.5

1.6 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

150

115 BHP

210

156 Nm

Technologies

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • X35 Fashion Plus MT

    • Electronic Engine Immobilizer
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Rear Camera
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Number of Airbags
    • Spare Wheel
    • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
    • Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
    • Seat belt reminder
  • Duster 1.6L PE (4x2)

    • ABS

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickDuster 1.6L PE (4x2)

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose X35 Fashion Plus MT if you care more about power; choose Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) if you care more about interior space.

Popular Car Comparisons

BAIC | X35 Fashion Plus MT

VS

Jeep | Jeep Cherokee 2018 3.2L Sport X

BAIC | X35 Fashion Plus MT

VS

BAIC | X7 1.5TD 7DCT Exclusive

BAIC | X35 Fashion Plus MT

VS

Jetour | X50 LUX

BAIC | X35 Fashion Plus MT

VS

GAC | GS3 EMZOOM GB

BAIC | X35 Fashion Plus MT

VS

Renault | Renault Duster 2023 1.6L Vision (4x2)

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, X35 Fashion Plus MT has a fuel consumption of No data, while Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) has a fuel consumption of 5.81. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, X35 Fashion Plus MT has a wheelbase of 2560, while Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) has a wheelbase of 2676 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Duster 1.6L PE (4x2), offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. X35 Fashion Plus MT uses Front Drive, while Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) uses Front Wheel Drive.