X90 1.5T M/T vs Other Comparison
Car Information
SUV
/
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
/
4
/
1462 cc
/
GCC
/
Dimensions
7 Seater
/
5 Doors
/
4840 mm
/
1925 mm
/
1745 mm
/
2850 mm
/
510 L
/
210 mm
/
Fuel Economy
12 Km/L
/
57 L
/
12 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
/
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Fabric
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
12.3
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
8
/
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
/
Key Spec
1.6 L
/
194 BHP
/
Automatic
/
Gasoline & Petrol
/
TBD
/
7 Seater
/
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED with Halogen
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
In-Line
/
1.5 L
/
Gasoline
/
Twin Turbo
/
4
/
197 BHP
/
290 Nm
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
X90 1.5T M/T
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Other
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickOther
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose X90 1.5T M/T if you care more about overall equipment; choose Other if you care more about overall equipment.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, X90 1.5T M/T has a fuel consumption of 8.33, while Other has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, X90 1.5T M/T has a wheelbase of 2850 mm, while Other has a wheelbase of No data. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. X90 1.5T M/T uses Front Wheel Drive, while Other uses No data.