X90 Plus 2.0T Comfort vs EMKOO 1.5 GE Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

200 km/h

/

4

/

1998 cc

/

Chinese

/

Dimensions

7

5

18

18

5 Doors

/

4838

4680

1914

1901

1775

1670

2830

2750

510 L

/

210 mm

/

Fuel Economy

12 Km/L

/

57 L

/

12 Km/L

/

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Smart Entry

/

/

/

Interior

/

/

/

Leather

/

Digital

/

Dual Zone

/

/

/

/

/

/

Electric

/

/

/

/

Standard

/

/

Driver Seat

/

7 Inch LCD

/

Passenger Seat

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

6

6

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

All Seats

Infotainment

12.3

10.25 Inch

/

/

Android LCD

/

8

6

/

/

/

/

Transmission

/

DCT

Chassis & Steering

Front Wheel Drive

/

/

McPherson Suspension

/

Multi-link Suspension

Wheels/brakes

/

235/60 R18

/

235/60 R18

Key Spec

1.6 L - 2.0 L

1.5 L - 2.0 L

194 BHP - 254

140 BHP - 177

7DCT & Automatic

Automatic & DCT & DHT

Gasoline

Gasoline & Hybrid

TBD

TBD

7 - 7

5

Exterior

/

/

/

/

LED

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

In-Line

/

2.0 L

1.5 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

Twin Turbo

/

4

/

254

140 BHP

390 Nm

/

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • X90 Plus 2.0T Comfort

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • 360 Degree camera
    • Rear Defogger
    • Rear Power Outlet
    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Keyless Start
    • Heater
    • Headlight On Reminder
    • Remote key types
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Number of Airbags
    • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
    • Child Lock
    • Speed Alert
    • Active braking
  • EMKOO 1.5 GE

    • Power Tailgate
    • 360 Degree Camera
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Number of Airbags
    • Collision Detection
    • Blind Spot Warning
    • Spare Wheel
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
    • Child Lock
    • Lane Departure Warning
    • Lane Keeping Assist
    • Seat belt reminder

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickEMKOO 1.5 GE

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose X90 Plus 2.0T Comfort if you care more about interior space; choose EMKOO 1.5 GE if you care more about price.

Popular Car Comparisons

Jetour | X90 Plus 2.0T Comfort

VS

Toyota | Toyota Rav4 2023 2.0L XLE AWD

Jetour | X90 Plus 2.0T Comfort

VS

Hongqi | Hongqi HS5 2023 2.0T Comfort

Jetour | X90 Plus 2.0T Comfort

VS

Hongqi | Hongqi HS5 2024 2.0T Comfort

Jetour | X90 Plus 2.0T Comfort

VS

Jeep | Jeep Compass 2019 2.4L Limited (4x4)

Jetour | X90 Plus 2.0T Comfort

VS

Hyundai | Hyundai Santa Fe 2019 3.5L Mid (AWD)

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, X90 Plus 2.0T Comfort has a fuel consumption of 8.33, while EMKOO 1.5 GE has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, X90 Plus 2.0T Comfort has a wheelbase of 2830, while EMKOO 1.5 GE has a wheelbase of 2750. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, X90 Plus 2.0T Comfort, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. X90 Plus 2.0T Comfort uses Front Wheel Drive, while EMKOO 1.5 GE uses No data.