XC90 2.0T B6 MHEV Inscription AWD (7-seater) vs Mercedes-AMG GLC 63 S E PERFORMANCE Coupé Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
180 km/h
275
Dimensions
7 Seater
5
4953 mm
4,792
2140 mm
1,920
1775 mm
1,603
2985 mm
2,888
314 L
/
/
2,310
Fuel Economy
13.5 Km/L
13.7
71 L
65
13.5 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Interior
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
Infotainment
/
Burmester®
Transmission
/
9-speed automatic
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
Four-Wheel Drive
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
2.0 L
2.0L
Gasoline
Hybrid
300 BHP
671
420 Nm
1,020
/
In-Line
/
✓
/
500
Technologies
✓
/
Key Spec
/
2.0
/
211 BHP
/
Automatic
/
Gasoline
/
TBD
/
5
Comparison of configuration highlights
XC90 2.0T B6 MHEV Inscription AWD (7-seater)
- 360 Degree camera
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Mercedes-AMG GLC 63 S E PERFORMANCE Coupé
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickMercedes-AMG GLC 63 S E PERFORMANCE Coupé
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose XC90 2.0T B6 MHEV Inscription AWD (7-seater) if you care more about interior space; choose Mercedes-AMG GLC 63 S E PERFORMANCE Coupé if you care more about fuel economy.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, XC90 2.0T B6 MHEV Inscription AWD (7-seater) has a fuel consumption of 7.41, while Mercedes-AMG GLC 63 S E PERFORMANCE Coupé has a fuel consumption of 7.3. Therefore, Mercedes-AMG GLC 63 S E PERFORMANCE Coupé is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, XC90 2.0T B6 MHEV Inscription AWD (7-seater) has a wheelbase of 2985 mm, while Mercedes-AMG GLC 63 S E PERFORMANCE Coupé has a wheelbase of 2,888. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, XC90 2.0T B6 MHEV Inscription AWD (7-seater), offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. XC90 2.0T B6 MHEV Inscription AWD (7-seater) uses All Wheel Drive, while Mercedes-AMG GLC 63 S E PERFORMANCE Coupé uses Four-Wheel Drive.