XE 2.0T R Dynamic (300 PS) vs S8 4.0 TFSI quattro (563 HP) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
250 km/h
250 km/h
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4672 mm
5179 mm
1967 mm
1945 mm
1462 mm
1474 mm
2835 mm
2998 mm
455 L
505 L
Fuel Economy
14.9 Km/L
10.4 Km/L
63 L
82 L
14.9 Km/L
10.4 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Interior
✓
/
Safety
✓
✓
Transmission
/
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Rear Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.0 L - 3.0 L
4.0 L
197 BHP - 377 BHP
520 BHP - 605 BHP
Automatic
Automatic & CVT
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
4 Seater - 5 Seater
Exterior
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.0 L
4.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
297 BHP
563 BHP
400 Nm
800 Nm
Technologies
✓
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
XE 2.0T R Dynamic (300 PS)
- 360 Degree camera
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
S8 4.0 TFSI quattro (563 HP)
- 360 Degree camera
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickXE 2.0T R Dynamic (300 PS)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose XE 2.0T R Dynamic (300 PS) if you care more about price; choose S8 4.0 TFSI quattro (563 HP) if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, XE 2.0T R Dynamic (300 PS) has a fuel consumption of 6.71, while S8 4.0 TFSI quattro (563 HP) has a fuel consumption of 9.62. Therefore, XE 2.0T R Dynamic (300 PS) is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, XE 2.0T R Dynamic (300 PS) has a wheelbase of 2835 mm, while S8 4.0 TFSI quattro (563 HP) has a wheelbase of 2998 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, S8 4.0 TFSI quattro (563 HP), offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. XE 2.0T R Dynamic (300 PS) uses Rear Wheel Drive, while S8 4.0 TFSI quattro (563 HP) uses All Wheel Drive.