Xforce GT CVT vs 2008 GT Comparison

Car Information

/

8.2

Engine / Motor

/

/

/

3

Dimensions

5

5

4390

4300

1810

1987

1660

1550

2650

/

/

17

/

545

Fuel Economy

/

16.8

42

44

Comfort

/

✓

/

/

/

❌

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

Interior

12.3

/

✓

✓

✓

✓

✓

/

✓

/

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

/

/

✓

Safety

✓

/

6

/

Front

✓

✓

/

✓

✓

✓

✓

✓

/

/

✓

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

Infotainment

✓

✓

6

/

/

10

/

✓

/

/

/

✓

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

✓

Transmission

CVT

AT

Chassis & Steering

/

Front Drive

Wheels/brakes

225/50 R18

/

225/50 R18

/

Key Spec

1.5

0.0 L - 1.6 L

105 BHP

110 BHP - 155 BHP

CVT

AT & Automatic

Gasoline

Electric & Gasoline & Petrol

TBD

TBD

5

5 - 5

Exterior

✓

/

/

/

/

/

/

✓

/

/

/

✓

/

/

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

/

Engine

1.5

1.2

Gasoline

Gasoline

105 BHP

130

141

230

Technologies

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

/

✓

/

✓

/

/

/

✓

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Xforce GT CVT

    • Rear Cross Traffic Alert
    • Number of Airbags
    • Collision Detection
    • Blind Spot Warning
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
  • 2008 GT

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Power Tailgate
    • 360 Degree camera
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Rear Camera
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Pedestrian airbag
    • First Aid Kit
    • Fire Extinguisher
    • Collision Detection
    • Speed Limiter
    • Auto Door Lock
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • Active braking

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickXforce GT CVT

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Xforce GT CVT if you care more about price; choose 2008 GT if you care more about power.

Popular Car Comparisons

Mitsubishi | Xforce GT CVT

VS

Renault | Renault Koleos 2023 2.5L LE (4WD)

Mitsubishi | Xforce GT CVT

VS

Geely | Geely Monjaro 2024 2.0TD Premium GF (4WD)

Mitsubishi | Xforce GT CVT

VS

Lynk & Co | Lynk & Co 01 2023 2.0T Hyper

Mitsubishi | Xforce GT CVT

VS

Hongqi | Hongqi HS5 2024 2.0T Comfort

Mitsubishi | Xforce GT CVT

VS

Lynk & Co | Lynk & Co 01 2024 2.0T Hyper

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Xforce GT CVT has a fuel consumption of No data, while 2008 GT has a fuel consumption of 5.95. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Xforce GT CVT has a wheelbase of 2650, while 2008 GT has a wheelbase of No data. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Xforce GT CVT uses No data, while 2008 GT uses Front Drive.