XJ 3.0L Luxury LWB (340 PS) vs Suzuki Carry 2023 1.5L M/T Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
250 km/h
140
/
4
Dimensions
5 Seater
2 Seater
5255 mm
4195
1899 mm
1765
1460 mm
1910
3175 mm
2205
520 L
/
Fuel Economy
11 Km/L
/
80 L
43
11 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Interior
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
/
Manual
Chassis & Steering
Rear Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
/
✓
Key Spec
2.0 L - 2995 L
/
238 BHP - 385 BHP
/
Automatic
/
Petrol
/
TBD
/
5 Seater
/
Exterior
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
3.0 L
1.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
340 BHP
95 BHP
450 Nm
135
Technologies
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
XJ 3.0L Luxury LWB (340 PS)
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Suzuki Carry 2023 1.5L M/T
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickSuzuki Carry 2023 1.5L M/T
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose XJ 3.0L Luxury LWB (340 PS) if you care more about interior space; choose Suzuki Carry 2023 1.5L M/T if you care more about overall equipment.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, XJ 3.0L Luxury LWB (340 PS) has a fuel consumption of 9.09, while Suzuki Carry 2023 1.5L M/T has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, XJ 3.0L Luxury LWB (340 PS) has a wheelbase of 3175 mm, while Suzuki Carry 2023 1.5L M/T has a wheelbase of 2205. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, XJ 3.0L Luxury LWB (340 PS), offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. XJ 3.0L Luxury LWB (340 PS) uses Rear Wheel Drive, while Suzuki Carry 2023 1.5L M/T uses Front Wheel Drive.