XTerra 2.5L SE (4WD) vs 5008 1.6T Active Plus Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
206 km/h
4
/
2490 cc
/
GCC
/
Dimensions
7 Seater
7 Seater
5 Doors
/
4900 mm
4641 mm
1865 mm
1844 mm
1865 mm
1646 mm
2850 mm
2840 mm
/
952 L
Fuel Economy
78 L
53 L
/
16.4 Km/L
/
16.4 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
Interior
✓
/
Safety
✓
✓
Transmission
Automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
Four Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.5 L - 2500 L
1.6 L - 1598 L
165 BHP
156 BHP - 180
Automatic
Automatic & Automatic
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
7 Seater
6 Seater - 7
Exterior
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Engine
In-Line
/
2.5 L
1.6 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
None
/
4
/
165 BHP
165 BHP
241 Nm
240 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
XTerra 2.5L SE (4WD)
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
5008 1.6T Active Plus
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- Strong off-road performance
- Practical and comfortable interior design
- Wide load capacity
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- Limited technological equipment
- The quality of the cabin materials is average
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's Pick5008 1.6T Active Plus
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose XTerra 2.5L SE (4WD) if you care more about interior space; choose 5008 1.6T Active Plus if you care more about overall equipment.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, XTerra 2.5L SE (4WD) has a fuel consumption of No data, while 5008 1.6T Active Plus has a fuel consumption of 6.1. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, XTerra 2.5L SE (4WD) has a wheelbase of 2850 mm, while 5008 1.6T Active Plus has a wheelbase of 2840 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, XTerra 2.5L SE (4WD), offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. XTerra 2.5L SE (4WD) uses Four Wheel Drive, while 5008 1.6T Active Plus uses Front Wheel Drive.