XUV 500 2.2L W6 (FWD) vs Tiggo 8 Super Hybrid Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
180 km/h
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
7
4585 mm
4725
1890 mm
1860
1785 mm
1705
2700 mm
/
96 L
/
/
19
Fuel Economy
15.4 Km/L
52.6
70 L
/
15.4 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
/
Front Row Seats
/
10.25
/
✓
/
10.25"
/
✓
/
✓
/
Triple
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
/
✓
/
8
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
15.6
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
8
Battery/Charging
/
4
Transmission
/
DHT
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Drive
Key Spec
2.2 L
1.5L
140 BHP
279
TBD
DHT
Gasoline
Hybrid
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
7
Exterior
✓
/
/
كهربائي
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.2 L
1.5L
Gasoline
Hybrid
140 BHP
279
320 Nm
365
Motor
/
6.6
Technologies
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Eco + Normal + Sport
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
XUV 500 2.2L W6 (FWD)
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Tiggo 8 Super Hybrid
- Power Tailgate
- Rear Defogger
- Emergency Lane Keeping (ELK）
- Number of Airbags
- Lane Following Assist
- Blind Spot Warning
- Lane Departure Warning
- Lane Keeping Assist
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickXUV 500 2.2L W6 (FWD)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose XUV 500 2.2L W6 (FWD) if you care more about price; choose Tiggo 8 Super Hybrid if you care more about fuel economy.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, XUV 500 2.2L W6 (FWD) has a fuel consumption of 6.49, while Tiggo 8 Super Hybrid has a fuel consumption of 1.9. Therefore, Tiggo 8 Super Hybrid is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, XUV 500 2.2L W6 (FWD) has a wheelbase of 2700 mm, while Tiggo 8 Super Hybrid has a wheelbase of No data. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. XUV 500 2.2L W6 (FWD) uses Front Wheel Drive, while Tiggo 8 Super Hybrid uses Front Drive.