Yukon 5.3 V8 SLE (2WD) vs GLA 250 4MATIC Comparison
Car Information
Dimensions
7 Seater
5
5334 mm
4,410
2057 mm
1,834
1943 mm
1,611
3071 mm
2,729
/
1,600
Fuel Economy
/
6.6 L/100 km
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
Transmission
/
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
/
Key Spec
5.3 L - 5300 L
/
355 BHP
/
Automatic
/
Gasoline & Petrol
/
TBD
/
7 Seater
/
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
5.3 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
355 BHP
224 hp
520 Nm
/
/
165
/
350 Nm
Comparison of configuration highlights
Yukon 5.3 V8 SLE (2WD)
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
GLA 250 4MATIC
- 360 Degree Camera
Review Comparison
Positive
- Spacious interior space
- Excellent towing capabilities
- Advanced entertainment systems
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- Their price is relatively high
- Its large size may be inappropriate for some areas
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickGLA 250 4MATIC
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Yukon 5.3 V8 SLE (2WD) if you care more about interior space; choose GLA 250 4MATIC if you care more about overall equipment.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Yukon 5.3 V8 SLE (2WD) has a fuel consumption of No data, while GLA 250 4MATIC has a fuel consumption of 15.15. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Yukon 5.3 V8 SLE (2WD) has a wheelbase of 3071 mm, while GLA 250 4MATIC has a wheelbase of 2,729. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Yukon 5.3 V8 SLE (2WD), offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Yukon 5.3 V8 SLE (2WD) uses Front Wheel Drive, while GLA 250 4MATIC uses No data.