ZS 1.3T LUX vs ASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
185
193 km/h
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
1318
/
17
/
5
/
4323
4355 mm
1809
1810 mm
1653
1625 mm
2585
2670 mm
359/1166
358 L
145
/
Fuel Economy
17.2
12.5 Km/L
45
63 L
/
12.5 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
Smart Key
/
Manual
/
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
Driver Seat
/
✓
/
Front Row Seats
/
Virtual Cluster
/
Passenger Seat
/
Leather
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
Drivers and Passenger Airbag Side Airbags Curtain Airbags
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Infotainment
10.1
/
✓
/
✓
/
6
/
Transmission
6
/
6AT
/
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Front Wheel Drive
McPherson Front Shock Absorber
/
H Torsional Beam
/
Wheels/brakes
Disc
/
Disc
/
215/55 R17
/
215/55 R17
/
Key Spec
1.3 L - 1.5 L
2.0 L - 2.0 L
112 BHP - 168
150 - 150
6AT & Automatic & CVT
Automatic & CVT
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
5 - 5
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
1.3 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
160 BHP
150 BHP
120
/
230
197 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
ZS 1.3T LUX
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- 360 Degree Camera
- Push Button Start
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Number of Airbags
- Blind Spot Warning
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
ASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- Modern and attractive exterior design
- Economical fuel consumption
- Competitive price compared to specifications
Negative
- Average interior material quality
- Engine performance is limited by power
- The lack of some advanced security systems
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose ZS 1.3T LUX if you care more about price; choose ASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, ZS 1.3T LUX has a fuel consumption of 5.81, while ASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option has a fuel consumption of 8. Therefore, ZS 1.3T LUX is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, ZS 1.3T LUX has a wheelbase of 2585, while ASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option has a wheelbase of 2670 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, ASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. ZS 1.3T LUX uses Front Drive, while ASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option uses Front Wheel Drive.