ZS 1.5L STD vs MG Whale 2024 2.0T Comfort Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
170
/
/
4
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
1318
/
17
/
5
/
4323
4702
1809
1903
1653
1691
2585
2765
359/1166
382
145
/
Fuel Economy
17.2
/
45
55
Comfort
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
Smart Key
/
Manual
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
Front Row Seats
/
Fabric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
Drivers and Passenger Airbag
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
10.1
/
✓
✓
✓
/
4
/
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
CVT
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
All Wheel Drive
McPherson Front Shock Absorber
/
H Torsional Beam
/
Wheels/brakes
Disc
/
Disc
/
215/55 R17
/
215/55 R17
/
Key Spec
1.3 L - 1.5 L
2.0 L
112 BHP - 168
228 BHP - 231 BHP
6AT & Automatic & CVT
8-Speed Automatic & Automatic
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
LED
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.5 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
118 BHP
228 BHP
88
/
180
370
Technologies
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
ZS 1.5L STD
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Push Button Start
- Parking sensor rear
- Rear Camera
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Number of Airbags
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
MG Whale 2024 2.0T Comfort
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Push Button Start
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Pedestrian airbag
- Fire Extinguisher
- Collision Detection
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
Review Comparison
Positive
- Modern and attractive exterior design
- Economical fuel consumption
- Competitive price compared to specifications
Negative
- Average interior material quality
- Engine performance is limited by power
- The lack of some advanced security systems
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose ZS 1.5L STD if you care more about price; choose MG Whale 2024 2.0T Comfort if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, ZS 1.5L STD has a fuel consumption of 5.81, while MG Whale 2024 2.0T Comfort has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, ZS 1.5L STD has a wheelbase of 2585, while MG Whale 2024 2.0T Comfort has a wheelbase of 2765. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, MG Whale 2024 2.0T Comfort , offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. ZS 1.5L STD uses Front Drive, while MG Whale 2024 2.0T Comfort uses All Wheel Drive.