03T vs Mazda CX-60 2023 3.3L e-Skyactiv-G V6 AWD Comparison
Car Information
/
SUV/
6.8
Engine / Motor
/
6
Dimensions
/
5 Seater
/
4745
/
1890
/
1687
/
2870
Fuel Economy
/
13.5
/
58
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
/
✓
/
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
/
All Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Key Spec
1.5
3.3 L - 3.3 L
422 - 422
280 HP - 284 BHP
AT
8 SPEED SKYACTIV® WITH Mi-DRIVE & 8-speed Automatic
Electric & Hybrid
Gasoline & Hybrid
TBD
TBD
5
5 - 7 Seater
Exterior
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
/
3.3 L
/
Gasoline
/
280 BHP
/
450
Technologies
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
03T
Mazda CX-60 2023 3.3L e-Skyactiv-G V6 AWD
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree camera
- Push Button Start
- Temperature Display
- Keyless Entry
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Advanced Air Bags System (AABS)
- Security System
- Pedestrian airbag
- Fire Extinguisher
- Active Understeer Control (AUC)
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- Speed Limiter
- Auto Door Lock
- Spare Wheel
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Active braking
- Lane Departure Warning
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickMazda CX-60 2023 3.3L e-Skyactiv-G V6 AWD
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose 03T if you care more about power; choose Mazda CX-60 2023 3.3L e-Skyactiv-G V6 AWD if you care more about overall equipment.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, 03T has a fuel consumption of No data, while Mazda CX-60 2023 3.3L e-Skyactiv-G V6 AWD has a fuel consumption of 7.41. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, 03T has a wheelbase of No data, while Mazda CX-60 2023 3.3L e-Skyactiv-G V6 AWD has a wheelbase of 2870. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. 03T uses No data, while Mazda CX-60 2023 3.3L e-Skyactiv-G V6 AWD uses All Wheel Drive.