Lexus RX350 F Sport 2.4L vs Q6 e-tron Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
260 km/h
/
4
/
2390 cc
/
GCC
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5
5 Doors
/
4890 mm
/
1920 mm
/
1695 mm
/
2850 mm
/
350 L
/
160 mm
/
Fuel Economy
13.4 km/L
/
67L
/
12 Km/L
/
Comfort
F Sport Steering Wheel
/
Interior
F Sport Leather Seats with Ventilation (Fr & Rr)
/
Transmission
8 Speed Automatic Transmission
DHT
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
/
Key Spec
3.5 L - 3.5 L
/
246 BHP - 366 BHP
279 BHP
6 Speed Automatic Transmission & 8 Speed Automatic Transmission & AT & Continuously Variable Transmission (CVT)
DHT
Hybrid & Petrol & Gasoline & Hybrid
Electric
TBD
/
5 Seater - 5 Seater
5
/
TBD
/
TBD
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
Triple Beam LED Headlamps
/
Engine
In-Line
/
2.4
/
Petrol
Electric
16-valve DOHC, Chain Drive
/
None
/
4
/
275 BHP
279 BHP
420 Nm
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
Lexus RX350 F Sport 2.4L
- Steering Adjustment
Q6 e-tron
Review Comparison
Positive
- Luxury design and high quality
- Good fuel efficiency
- Advanced technology and amenities
Negative
- The price is high for some competitors
- Limited back-end storage space
- Less sharp control compared to some sports cars
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Lexus RX350 F Sport 2.4L if you care more about price; choose Q6 e-tron if you care more about power.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Lexus RX350 F Sport 2.4L has a fuel consumption of 7.46, while Q6 e-tron has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Lexus RX350 F Sport 2.4L has a wheelbase of 2850 mm , while Q6 e-tron has a wheelbase of No data. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Lexus RX350 F Sport 2.4L uses Front Wheel Drive , while Q6 e-tron uses No data.