296 GTB 3.0T V6 PHEV vs 812 Superfast 6.5L V12 Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
330 km/h
340 km/h
Dimensions
2 Seater
2 Seater
4565 mm
4657 mm
1958 mm
1971 mm
1187 mm
1276 mm
2600 mm
2720 mm
Fuel Economy
15.6 Km/L
6.7 Km/L
65 L
92 L
15.6 Km/L
6.7 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Safety
✓
✓
Chassis & Steering
Rear Wheel Drive
Rear Wheel Drive
Key Spec
3.0 L
6.5 L
819 BHP
789 BHP - 800 BHP
Automatic
Automatic
Hybrid
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
2 Seater
2 Seater
Exterior
✓
✓
/
✓
Engine
3.0 L
6.5 L
Hybrid
Gasoline
819 BHP
800 BHP
740 Nm
718 Nm
Technologies
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
296 GTB 3.0T V6 PHEV
- 360 Degree camera
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
812 Superfast 6.5L V12
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's Pick296 GTB 3.0T V6 PHEV
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose 296 GTB 3.0T V6 PHEV if you care more about price; choose 812 Superfast 6.5L V12 if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, 296 GTB 3.0T V6 PHEV has a fuel consumption of 6.41, while 812 Superfast 6.5L V12 has a fuel consumption of 14.93. Therefore, 296 GTB 3.0T V6 PHEV is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, 296 GTB 3.0T V6 PHEV has a wheelbase of 2600 mm, while 812 Superfast 6.5L V12 has a wheelbase of 2720 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, 812 Superfast 6.5L V12, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. 296 GTB 3.0T V6 PHEV uses Rear Wheel Drive, while 812 Superfast 6.5L V12 uses Rear Wheel Drive.