296 GTB 3.0T V6 PHEV vs DBS 5.2T V12 Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
330 km/h
340 km/h
Dimensions
2 Seater
4 Seater
4565 mm
4712 mm
1958 mm
1942 mm
1187 mm
1280 mm
2600 mm
2805 mm
Fuel Economy
15.6 Km/L
8.2 Km/L
65 L
/
15.6 Km/L
8.2 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Safety
✓
✓
Chassis & Steering
Rear Wheel Drive
Rear Wheel Drive
Key Spec
3.0 L
5.2 L
819 BHP
715 BHP - 770 BHP
Automatic
Automatic
Hybrid
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
2 Seater
4 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
Engine
3.0 L
5.2 L
Hybrid
Gasoline
819 BHP
715 BHP
740 Nm
900 Nm
Technologies
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
296 GTB 3.0T V6 PHEV
- 360 Degree camera
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
DBS 5.2T V12
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickDBS 5.2T V12
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose 296 GTB 3.0T V6 PHEV if you care more about fuel economy; choose DBS 5.2T V12 if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, 296 GTB 3.0T V6 PHEV has a fuel consumption of 6.41, while DBS 5.2T V12 has a fuel consumption of 12.2. Therefore, 296 GTB 3.0T V6 PHEV is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, 296 GTB 3.0T V6 PHEV has a wheelbase of 2600 mm, while DBS 5.2T V12 has a wheelbase of 2805 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, DBS 5.2T V12, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. 296 GTB 3.0T V6 PHEV uses Rear Wheel Drive, while DBS 5.2T V12 uses Rear Wheel Drive.