296 GTB 3.0T V6 PHEV vs F8 Tributo 3.9T V8 Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
330 km/h
340 km/h
Dimensions
2 Seater
2 Seater
4565 mm
4611 mm
1958 mm
1979 mm
1187 mm
1206 mm
2600 mm
2650 mm
/
200 L
Fuel Economy
15.6 Km/L
7.8 Km/L
65 L
78 L
15.6 Km/L
7.8 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
Safety
✓
✓
Chassis & Steering
Rear Wheel Drive
Rear Wheel Drive
Key Spec
3.0 L
3.9 L
819 BHP
710 BHP
Automatic
Automatic
Hybrid
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
2 Seater
2 Seater
Exterior
✓
✓
Engine
3.0 L
3.9 L
Hybrid
Gasoline
819 BHP
710 BHP
740 Nm
770 Nm
Comparison of configuration highlights
296 GTB 3.0T V6 PHEV
- 360 Degree camera
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
F8 Tributo 3.9T V8
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's Pick296 GTB 3.0T V6 PHEV
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose 296 GTB 3.0T V6 PHEV if you care more about price; choose F8 Tributo 3.9T V8 if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, 296 GTB 3.0T V6 PHEV has a fuel consumption of 6.41, while F8 Tributo 3.9T V8 has a fuel consumption of 12.82. Therefore, 296 GTB 3.0T V6 PHEV is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, 296 GTB 3.0T V6 PHEV has a wheelbase of 2600 mm, while F8 Tributo 3.9T V8 has a wheelbase of 2650 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, F8 Tributo 3.9T V8, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. 296 GTB 3.0T V6 PHEV uses Rear Wheel Drive, while F8 Tributo 3.9T V8 uses Rear Wheel Drive.