300 Challenger 2.0T HEV vs Mazda CX-9 2024 2.5T Ignite Edition (AWD) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
210
4
4
1998 cc
/
Chinese
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
7 Seater
5 Doors
/
4760 mm
5075
1930 mm
1969
1927 mm
1716
2750 mm
2930
400 L
407
224 m
/
Fuel Economy
15 Km/L
11.8
75 L
74
15 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Keyless Entry
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
Driver Seat
✓
/
✓
✓
Leather
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
✓
Standard
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
12.3
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
Android LCD
/
✓
/
9
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Four Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
/
✓
Wheels/brakes
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Key Spec
2.0 L
2.5 L - 3.7 L
217 BHP - 342 BHP
226 BHP - 273 BHP
8-Speed Automatic & Automatic
Automatic
Gasoline & Hybrid
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
7 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
LED
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
/
2.0 L
2.5 L
Hybrid
Gasoline
Single Turbo
/
4
/
342 BHP
230 BHP
648 Nm
420
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
300 Challenger 2.0T HEV
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Mazda CX-9 2024 2.5T Ignite Edition (AWD)
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- Rear Defogger
- Push Button Start
- Temperature Display
- Keyless Entry
- Welcome Light
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Rollover stability control
- Runflat Tyres
- Advanced Air Bags System (AABS)
- Pedestrian airbag
- Fire Extinguisher
- Active Understeer Control (AUC)
- Active Bonnet
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- Crash Auto Door Unlock
- Auto Door Lock
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
- Lane Departure Warning
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose 300 Challenger 2.0T HEV if you care more about fuel economy; choose Mazda CX-9 2024 2.5T Ignite Edition (AWD) if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, 300 Challenger 2.0T HEV has a fuel consumption of 6.67, while Mazda CX-9 2024 2.5T Ignite Edition (AWD) has a fuel consumption of 8.47. Therefore, 300 Challenger 2.0T HEV is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, 300 Challenger 2.0T HEV has a wheelbase of 2750 mm, while Mazda CX-9 2024 2.5T Ignite Edition (AWD) has a wheelbase of 2930. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Mazda CX-9 2024 2.5T Ignite Edition (AWD) , offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. 300 Challenger 2.0T HEV uses Four Wheel Drive, while Mazda CX-9 2024 2.5T Ignite Edition (AWD) uses All Wheel Drive.