300 S Sport 5.7L vs Charger GT 3.6L V6 Black Edition Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
260 km/h
220 km/h
8
6
5697 cc
3598 cc
American
GCC
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4 Doors
4 Doors
5044 mm
5039 mm
1905 mm
1905 mm
1490 mm
1486 mm
3048 mm
3048 mm
461 L
467 L
127 m
132 m
Fuel Economy
8 Km/L
14 Km/L
70 L
70 L
8 Km/L
14 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Keyless Entry
Keyless Entry
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Leather
Leather
Digital
Digital
Dual Zone
Dual Zone
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
Electric
Electric
✓
✓
✓
✓
Standard
Bucket
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Infotainment
8.4
8.3
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Android LCD
Android LCD
✓
✓
9
6
Chassis & Steering
Rear Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Key Spec
3.6 L - 6.4 L
3.6 L - 6.4 L
292 BHP - 472 BHP
292 BHP - 797 BHP
Automatic
Automatic
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
4 Seater - 5 Seater
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
LED with Halogen
LED
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Engine
V
V
5.7 L
3.6 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
4
4
363 BHP
300 BHP
534 Nm
358 Nm
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
300 S Sport 5.7L
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Rear Defogger
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Charger GT 3.6L V6 Black Edition
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Amazing power and acceleration
- Unique American muscular design
- Pleasant driving experience and excellent control
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- The quality of interior materials is average
- Suspension comfort is not ideal
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose 300 S Sport 5.7L if you care more about price; choose Charger GT 3.6L V6 Black Edition if you care more about fuel economy.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, 300 S Sport 5.7L has a fuel consumption of 12.5, while Charger GT 3.6L V6 Black Edition has a fuel consumption of 7.14. Therefore, Charger GT 3.6L V6 Black Edition is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, 300 S Sport 5.7L has a wheelbase of 3048 mm, while Charger GT 3.6L V6 Black Edition has a wheelbase of 3048 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. 300 S Sport 5.7L uses Rear Wheel Drive, while Charger GT 3.6L V6 Black Edition uses All Wheel Drive.