3008 1.6T Active+ vs Mokka 1.2T Ultimate Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
222 km/h
200 km/h
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4447 mm
4151 mm
1610 mm
1791 mm
1624 mm
1531 mm
2675 mm
2557 mm
520 L
options.1,372 L
Fuel Economy
15.4 Km/L
16.9 Km/L
53 L
44 L
15.4 Km/L
16.9 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
1.6 L - 1.6 L
/
156 BHP - 300 BHP
/
Automatic & Automatic
/
Gasoline & Hybrid & Petrol
/
TBD
/
5 - 6 Seater
/
Exterior
✓
/
Engine
1.6 L
1.2 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
181 BHP
130 BHP
250 Nm
230 Nm
Comparison of configuration highlights
3008 1.6T Active+
- 360 Degree camera
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- ABS
Mokka 1.2T Ultimate
- 360 Degree camera
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickMokka 1.2T Ultimate
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose 3008 1.6T Active+ if you care more about interior space; choose Mokka 1.2T Ultimate if you care more about fuel economy.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, 3008 1.6T Active+ has a fuel consumption of 6.49, while Mokka 1.2T Ultimate has a fuel consumption of 5.92. Therefore, Mokka 1.2T Ultimate is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, 3008 1.6T Active+ has a wheelbase of 2675 mm, while Mokka 1.2T Ultimate has a wheelbase of 2557 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, 3008 1.6T Active+, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. 3008 1.6T Active+ uses Front Wheel Drive, while Mokka 1.2T Ultimate uses Front Wheel Drive.