3008 1.6T GT vs 3008 1.6T GT Comparison
Car Information
SUV
/
Engine / Motor
222 km/h
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
/
4447 mm
/
1841 mm
/
1624 mm
/
2675 mm
/
520 L
/
Fuel Economy
15.4 Km/L
/
53 L
/
15.4 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
/
Key Spec
1.6 L - 1600 L
/
156 BHP - 300 BHP
/
Automatic & Automatic
/
Gasoline & Hybrid & Petrol
/
TBD
/
5 - 6 Seater
/
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
1.6 L
/
Gasoline
/
181 BHP
/
250 Nm
/
Technologies
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
3008 1.6T GT
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
3008 1.6T GT
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's Pick3008 1.6T GT
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose 3008 1.6T GT if you care more about overall equipment; choose 3008 1.6T GT if you care more about overall equipment.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, 3008 1.6T GT has a fuel consumption of 6.49, while 3008 1.6T GT has a fuel consumption of 6.49. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, 3008 1.6T GT has a wheelbase of 2675 mm, while 3008 1.6T GT has a wheelbase of 2675 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. 3008 1.6T GT uses Front Wheel Drive, while 3008 1.6T GT uses Front Wheel Drive.