3008 1.6T GT vs Highlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
222 km/h
/
/
4
/
GCC
Dimensions
5 Seater
7 Seater
4447 mm
4950 mm
1841 mm
1930 mm
1624 mm
1730 mm
2675 mm
2850 mm
520 L
/
/
5 Doors
Fuel Economy
15.4 Km/L
20 Km/L
53 L
65 L
15.4 Km/L
20 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
Safety
✓
/
Transmission
/
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Key Spec
1.6 L - 1.6 L
2.5 L - 2.5 L
156 BHP - 300 BHP
240 BHP - 240 BHP
Automatic & Automatic
Automatic & CVT & eCVT & Electronically controlled Continuously Variable Transmission (ECVT)
Gasoline & Hybrid & Petrol
Hybrid & Hybrid
TBD
TBD
5 - 6 Seater
7 Seater - 7 Seater
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
Engine
1.6 L
2.5 L
Gasoline
Hybrid
181 BHP
240 BHP
250 Nm
237 Nm
/
In-Line
/
None
/
4
Technologies
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
3008 1.6T GT
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Highlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD)
- Rear Camera
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's Pick3008 1.6T GT
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose 3008 1.6T GT if you care more about price; choose Highlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD) if you care more about fuel economy.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, 3008 1.6T GT has a fuel consumption of 6.49, while Highlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD) has a fuel consumption of 5. Therefore, Highlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD) is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, 3008 1.6T GT has a wheelbase of 2675 mm, while Highlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD) has a wheelbase of 2850 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Highlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD), offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. 3008 1.6T GT uses Front Wheel Drive, while Highlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD) uses All Wheel Drive.