3008 GT 1.6L vs Mazda CX-9 2024 2.5T High Plus (AWD) Comparison

Car Information

147

/

300

/

Dimensions

5

7 Seater

4542

5075

1895

1969

1641

1716

2730

2930

588

/

Fuel Economy

/

74

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Interior

Front Row Seats

/

Front Row Seats

/

Front Row Seats

/

Front Row Seats

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Transmission

Automatic

Automatic

Chassis & Steering

/

All Wheel Drive

Wheels/brakes

/

/

/

Key Spec

1.6 L - 1.6 L

2.5 L - 3.7 L

156 BHP - 300 BHP

226 BHP - 273 BHP

Automatic & Automatic

Automatic

Gasoline & Hybrid & Petrol

Gasoline & Petrol

TBD

TBD

5 - 6 Seater

7 Seater

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

1.6

2.5 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

180

226 BHP

147

/

6000

/

300

420

4500

/

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • 3008 GT 1.6L

    • Power Tailgate
    • 360 Degree Camera
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Lane Following Assist
    • Collision Detection
    • Blind Spot Warning
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • Lane Departure Warning
    • Lane Keeping Assist
  • Mazda CX-9 2024 2.5T High Plus (AWD)

    • Power Tailgate
    • 360 Degree camera
    • Push Button Start
    • Keyless Entry
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Pedestrian airbag
    • Fire Extinguisher
    • Door Edge Protector
    • Active Understeer Control (AUC)
    • Active Bonnet
    • Collision Detection
    • Auto Door Lock
    • Spare Wheel
    • Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
    • Active braking

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickMazda CX-9 2024 2.5T High Plus (AWD)

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose 3008 GT 1.6L if you care more about overall equipment; choose Mazda CX-9 2024 2.5T High Plus (AWD) if you care more about interior space.

Popular Car Comparisons

Peugeot | 3008 GT 1.6L

VS

Jeep | Grand Cherokee 3.6L Laredo

Peugeot | 3008 GT 1.6L

VS

Hyundai | Hyundai Palisade 2022 3.8L GDi (AWD) Premium (7 Seats)

Peugeot | 3008 GT 1.6L

VS

Tesla | Model Y Rear-Wheel Drive

Peugeot | 3008 GT 1.6L

VS

Tesla | Tesla Model Y 2023 Standard Range

Peugeot | 3008 GT 1.6L

VS

Tesla | Tesla Model Y 2024 Standard Range

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, 3008 GT 1.6L has a fuel consumption of No data, while Mazda CX-9 2024 2.5T High Plus (AWD) has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, 3008 GT 1.6L has a wheelbase of 2730 , while Mazda CX-9 2024 2.5T High Plus (AWD) has a wheelbase of 2930. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Mazda CX-9 2024 2.5T High Plus (AWD) , offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. 3008 GT 1.6L uses No data, while Mazda CX-9 2024 2.5T High Plus (AWD) uses All Wheel Drive.