308 1.6L GT Line vs Mazda 3 Hatchback 2.0L Allure Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
188 km/h
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4253 mm
/
1863 mm
/
1472 mm
/
2610 mm
/
420 L
/
Fuel Economy
15.4 Km/L
17.8
60 L
/
15.4 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
Transmission
/
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
/
Key Spec
1.6 L
2.0 L - 2.0 L
120 BHP - 163 BHP
151 BHP - 153 HP
Automatic
6 SPEED SKYACTIV WITH SPORTS MODE & Automatic
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
5 - 5
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
1.6 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
163 BHP
151 BHP
240 Nm
/
Technologies
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
308 1.6L GT Line
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Mazda 3 Hatchback 2.0L Allure
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's Pick308 1.6L GT Line
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose 308 1.6L GT Line if you care more about price; choose Mazda 3 Hatchback 2.0L Allure if you care more about fuel economy.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, 308 1.6L GT Line has a fuel consumption of 6.49, while Mazda 3 Hatchback 2.0L Allure has a fuel consumption of 5.62. Therefore, Mazda 3 Hatchback 2.0L Allure is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, 308 1.6L GT Line has a wheelbase of 2610 mm, while Mazda 3 Hatchback 2.0L Allure has a wheelbase of No data. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. 308 1.6L GT Line uses Front Wheel Drive, while Mazda 3 Hatchback 2.0L Allure uses No data.