408 GT vs Atto 3 Premium Comparison

Car Information

8.2

7.3S

158

/

300

/

/

420

/

60.48 kW/h

/

14.9

Engine / Motor

/

160 km/h

/

Chinese

Dimensions

5

5

4687

4455 mm

1848

2050 mm

1486

1615 mm

2787

2720 mm

536

440 L

/

215/55R18

/

5 Doors

/

205 mm

Fuel Economy

/

/

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Smart Entry

/

Interior

Front Row Seats

Front Row Seats

Front Row Seats

/

/

/

/

Electric

/

/

/

Front Row Seats

/

5

/

LCD

/

/

/

Leather

/

Digital

/

Single

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Standard

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

Automatic Anti-Glare

/

RCW

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

Android LCD

/

12.8”Electric Rotary Multimedia Screen

/

/

/

8

Battery/Charging

/

AC (7KW) DC (80KW)

Transmission

Automatic

DHT

Chassis & Steering

/

Front Wheel Drive

Key Spec

1.5 L - 2.0 L

/

143 BHP - 215

201 BHP

Automatic

AT & DHT

Gasoline & Petrol

Electric

TBD

/

5 - 5

5 - 5

/

TBD

/

420 km

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

LED

/

/

Engine

1.6

/

Gasoline

Electric

215

201 BHP

158

/

5500

/

300

310 Nm

2000

/

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Motor

/

9

/

BYD Blade Battery (LFP)

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • 408 GT

    • Power Tailgate
    • 360 Degree Camera
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Lane Following Assist
    • Driving Recorder
    • Security System
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • ABS
    • Lane Departure Warning
    • Lane Keeping Assist
  • Atto 3 Premium

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • 360 Degree Camera
    • Rear Defogger
    • Rear Power Outlet
    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Keyless Start
    • Heater
    • Rear Camera
    • Headlight On Reminder
    • Remote key types
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Lane Following Assist
    • Electric anti-dazzling room mirror
    • Collision Detection
    • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Lock
    • Speed Alert
    • Active braking
    • Lane Departure Warning
    • Lane Keeping Assist

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickAtto 3 Premium

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose 408 GT if you care more about interior space; choose Atto 3 Premium if you care more about price.

Popular Car Comparisons

Peugeot | 408 GT

VS

Exeed | TXL Flagship 2.0T

Peugeot | 408 GT

VS

Exeed | Exeed TXL 2023 2.0T-GDI Flagship (4WD)

Peugeot | 408 GT

VS

Exeed | Exeed TXL 2024 2.0T-GDI Flagship (4WD)

Peugeot | 408 GT

VS

Dodge | Durango 3.6L SXT Plus (RWD)

Peugeot | 408 GT

VS

Peugeot | Peugeot 3008 2023 1.6T GT

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, 408 GT has a fuel consumption of No data, while Atto 3 Premium has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, 408 GT has a wheelbase of 2787, while Atto 3 Premium has a wheelbase of 2720 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, 408 GT, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. 408 GT uses No data, while Atto 3 Premium uses Front Wheel Drive.