408 GT vs Atto 8 Premium FWD Comparison
Car Information
Dimensions
5
5
4687
5040
1848
1996
1486
1760
2787
2950
536
/
/
20
/
5.9 M
/
165 mm
Fuel Economy
/
34.7
/
60
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Interior
Front Row Seats
/
Front Row Seats
Front Row Seats
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
Front Row Seats
/
10.25
/
PU
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Front Driver's & Passenger's Airbag/ Farside Airbag/Front & Rear Side Airbags/Integrated Side Air Curtain
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
15.6
/
✓
/
10
Battery/Charging
/
40
Transmission
Automatic
AT
Chassis & Steering
/
Front Drive
/
Double Wishbone Type
/
Five-link
Wheels/brakes
/
255/50 R20
/
255/50 R20
Key Spec
1.5 L - 2.0 L
1.5
143 BHP - 215
275 - 480
Automatic
AT
Gasoline & Petrol
Hybrid
TBD
TBD
5 - 5
5 - 7
Exterior
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.6
1.5
Gasoline
Hybrid
215
275
158
/
5500
/
300
/
2000
/
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Sport / Normal / Eco
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
408 GT
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree Camera
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Lane Following Assist
- Driving Recorder
- Security System
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- ABS
- Lane Departure Warning
- Lane Keeping Assist
Atto 8 Premium FWD
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree Camera
- Keyless Entry
- Rear Cross Traffic Alert
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- Intelligent Emergency Call
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
- Lane Departure Warning
- Lane Keeping Assist
- Seat belt reminder
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose 408 GT if you care more about price; choose Atto 8 Premium FWD if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, 408 GT has a fuel consumption of No data, while Atto 8 Premium FWD has a fuel consumption of 2.88. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, 408 GT has a wheelbase of 2787, while Atto 8 Premium FWD has a wheelbase of 2950. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Atto 8 Premium FWD, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. 408 GT uses No data, while Atto 8 Premium FWD uses Front Drive.