408 GT vs CR-V DX Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
4
/
1498cc
Dimensions
5
7
4687
4706
1848
1866
1486
1681
2787
2700
536
150
/
1668
/
17 英寸
/
/
/
198
Fuel Economy
/
/
/
57
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
Front Row Seats
/
Front Row Seats
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
7
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
6
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
7
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
8
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
/
CVT
Chassis & Steering
/
Front Drive
Wheels/brakes
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
235/65R17
/
235/65R17
/
✓
Key Spec
1.5 L - 2.0 L
1.5 L - 2.4 L
143 BHP - 215
184 BHP - 190
Automatic
Automatic & CVT
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 - 5
5 Seater - 7
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.6
1.5
Gasoline
Gasoline
215
190
158
140.7
5500
6000
300
243
2000
1700-5000
/
In-Line
/
Turbocharge
/
1.5L VTEC Turbo
/
4
/
10.3:1
/
DOHC DUAL VTC + Exhaust-VTEC
/
直喷
/
Euro 5
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
408 GT
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree Camera
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Lane Following Assist
- Driving Recorder
- Security System
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- ABS
- Lane Departure Warning
- Lane Keeping Assist
CR-V DX
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Rear Defogger
- Push Button Start
- Temperature Display
- Keyless Entry
- Welcome Light
- Seats - Comfort
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- Lane Following Assist
- Driving Recorder
- Rear Crumple Zone
- Front Crumple Zone
- Front and Rear Crumple Zone
- Rollover stability control
- Advanced Air Bags System (AABS)
- Door Reflectors
- Electric anti-dazzling room mirror
- Tire Repair Kit
- Security System
- Pedestrian airbag
- Crosswind Assist
- Active Understeer Control (AUC)
- Active Bonnet
- Acceleration Skid Control
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- Knee Bag - Driver
- Speed Limiter
- Crash Auto Door Unlock
- Auto Door Lock
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
- Active Safety Warning System
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
- Lane Departure Warning
- Lane Keeping Assist
- Seat belt reminder
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- High reliability and durable performance
- A wide range of security technologies
- Excellent fuel efficiency
Negative
- The price is higher than some competitors
- Lack of hybrid drive options in some markets
- Limited charging capacity compared to some competitors
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose 408 GT if you care more about price; choose CR-V DX if you care more about power.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, 408 GT has a fuel consumption of No data, while CR-V DX has a fuel consumption of 6.45. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, 408 GT has a wheelbase of 2787, while CR-V DX has a wheelbase of 2700. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, 408 GT, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. 408 GT uses No data, while CR-V DX uses Front Drive.