408 GT vs CX90 High Plus Comparison

Car Information

8.2

/

158

/

300

/

Engine / Motor

/

210 km/h

/

6

/

3289 cc

/

GCC

Dimensions

5

7 Seater

4687

5100 mm

1848

1994 mm

1486

1745 mm

2787

3010 mm

536

566 L

/

5 Doors

/

201 m

Fuel Economy

/

10.5 Km/L

/

71 L

/

10.5 Km/L

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Smart Entry

/

/

Interior

Front Row Seats

Front Row Seats

/

/

/

/

Electric

/

/

/

/

/

Vinyl Upholstery

/

Digital

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Standard

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

/

Standard LCD

/

/

/

9.25

/

/

/

8

Transmission

Automatic

/

Chassis & Steering

/

All Wheel Drive

Key Spec

1.5 L - 2.0 L

3.3 L - 3.3 L

143 BHP - 215

340 HP - 345 BHP

Automatic

8 SPEED SKYACTIV WITH Mi-DRIVE & Automatic

Gasoline & Petrol

Gasoline & Hybrid & Petrol

TBD

TBD

5 - 5

6 - 8

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

LED

/

/

Engine

1.6

3.3 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

215

345 BHP

158

/

5500

/

300

500 Nm

2000

/

/

V

/

Single Turbo

/

4

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • 408 GT

    • Power Tailgate
    • 360 Degree Camera
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Lane Following Assist
    • Driving Recorder
    • Security System
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • ABS
    • Lane Departure Warning
    • Lane Keeping Assist
  • CX90 High Plus

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Power Tailgate
    • Rear Defogger
    • Rear Power Outlet
    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Keyless Start
    • Heater
    • Rear Camera
    • Headlight On Reminder
    • Remote key types
    • Sensor Rear Tailgate
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Lock
    • Speed Alert
    • Active braking

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's Pick408 GT

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose 408 GT if you care more about price; choose CX90 High Plus if you care more about interior space.

Popular Car Comparisons

Peugeot | 408 GT

VS

Exeed | TXL Flagship 2.0T

Peugeot | 408 GT

VS

Exeed | Exeed TXL 2023 2.0T-GDI Flagship (4WD)

Peugeot | 408 GT

VS

Exeed | Exeed TXL 2024 2.0T-GDI Flagship (4WD)

Peugeot | 408 GT

VS

Dodge | Durango 3.6L SXT Plus (RWD)

Peugeot | 408 GT

VS

Peugeot | Peugeot 3008 2023 1.6T GT

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, 408 GT has a fuel consumption of No data, while CX90 High Plus has a fuel consumption of 9.52. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, 408 GT has a wheelbase of 2787, while CX90 High Plus has a wheelbase of 3010 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, CX90 High Plus, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. 408 GT uses No data, while CX90 High Plus uses All Wheel Drive.