408 GT vs Skoda Kodiaq 2023 2.0 TSI Style (AWD) Comparison

Car Information

8.2

8.2

158

/

300

/

Engine / Motor

/

207

/

4

Dimensions

5

7 Seater

4687

4697

1848

1882

1486

1681

2787

2791

536

650

Fuel Economy

/

13.5

/

60

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Interior

Front Row Seats

/

Front Row Seats

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Transmission

Automatic

Automatic

Chassis & Steering

/

All Wheel Drive

Key Spec

2.0 L - 2.0 L

/

143 BHP - 215

/

Automatic

/

Gasoline

/

TBD

/

5 - 5

/

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

1.6

2.0 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

215

180 BHP

158

/

5500

/

300

320

2000

/

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • 408 GT

    • Power Tailgate
    • 360 Degree Camera
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Lane Following Assist
    • Driving Recorder
    • Security System
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • ABS
    • Lane Departure Warning
    • Lane Keeping Assist
  • Skoda Kodiaq 2023 2.0 TSI Style (AWD)

    • Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Power Tailgate
    • 360 Degree camera
    • Rear Defogger
    • Push Button Start
    • Temperature Display
    • Keyless Entry
    • Welcome Light
    • Rear Camera
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Blind Spot Warning
    • Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
    • Active braking

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickSkoda Kodiaq 2023 2.0 TSI Style (AWD)

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose 408 GT if you care more about overall equipment; choose Skoda Kodiaq 2023 2.0 TSI Style (AWD) if you care more about interior space.

Popular Car Comparisons

Peugeot | 408 GT

VS

Mazda | Mazda CX9 2019 2.5L Luxury (AWD)

Peugeot | 408 GT

VS

Hongqi | HS5 Deluxe Pro 4WD

Peugeot | 408 GT

VS

Hongqi | HS5 Deluxe Pro 4WD

Peugeot | 408 GT

VS

Peugeot | ALL-NEW 5008 GT

Peugeot | 408 GT

VS

Hyundai | Hyundai Palisade 2021 3.8L GDi (AWD) Comfort

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, 408 GT has a fuel consumption of No data, while Skoda Kodiaq 2023 2.0 TSI Style (AWD) has a fuel consumption of 7.41. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, 408 GT has a wheelbase of 2787, while Skoda Kodiaq 2023 2.0 TSI Style (AWD) has a wheelbase of 2791. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Skoda Kodiaq 2023 2.0 TSI Style (AWD), offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. 408 GT uses No data, while Skoda Kodiaq 2023 2.0 TSI Style (AWD) uses All Wheel Drive.